[WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2010


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 105816
interpreted = N
texte = Good morning everyone! this email is for WebDNA users working with MySQL. We would like to know = how many of you need MySQL support and the reason why you prefer using = MySQL instead of the internal database system. As you know, MySQL now belongs to Oracle with license restrictions and = we were thinking, in case external database support is necessary, if a = better/faster ODBC support woud not be a more universal idea. We also = gave SQLite a thought, but despite its qualities, the internal WebDNA = database system is more powerful. This is not a trivial matter, so we will listen to everyone. thank you! - chris= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Stuart Tremain 2010)
  2. RE: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA ("Dale Therio" 2010)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Brian Fries 2010)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA ("Mr. Robert Minor Jr." 2010)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  6. RE: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA ("Terry Nair" 2010)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Paul Willis 2010)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Paul Willis 2010)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Govinda 2010)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Toby Cox 2010)
  13. RE: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA ("Will Starck" 2010)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Govinda 2010)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Toby Cox 2010)
  16. [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
Good morning everyone! this email is for WebDNA users working with MySQL. We would like to know = how many of you need MySQL support and the reason why you prefer using = MySQL instead of the internal database system. As you know, MySQL now belongs to Oracle with license restrictions and = we were thinking, in case external database support is necessary, if a = better/faster ODBC support woud not be a more universal idea. We also = gave SQLite a thought, but despite its qualities, the internal WebDNA = database system is more powerful. This is not a trivial matter, so we will listen to everyone. thank you! - chris= christophe.billiottet@webdna.us

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Help name our technology! (1997) & not allowed in db by definition? (1999) Text data with spaces in them... (1997) [WebDNA] preventing hackers from posting their own (altered) (2009) Nesting format tags (1997) Introduction/Tutorial/QuickStart (1997) Sendmail (1999) All choices on IE different than Netscape (1997) problems with 2 tags shakur (1997) Generating unique SKU from [cart] - Still Stumped... (1997) Signal Raised (1997) Coding Standards - are there any ? (2003) File Upload (1997) ShowNext problems (1998) Pithy questions on webcommerce & siteedit (1997) Cart date/time (2006) RE: IIS4b2 and WebCatalog b19 (1997) Showif, Hideif reverse logic ? (1997) Document Contains No Data! (1997) Store Builder Weirdness (1999)