Re: [BULK] Re: [WebDNA] abstraction code can be tricky...
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2012
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108313
interpreted = N
texte = >> webdna's allotted ram-usage limit for lack of a better term, I called it that ("webdna's allotted = ram-usage limit"). Let me explain: Obviously the company line is that the only limit is the amount of RAM = on the server machine. But coding aggressively has for some/many of us revealed a phenomena - = that a page which tries to use "more RAM than what we usually gobble up = with our code", can, when hit with the browser, simply never load in the = browser.. and even if we then comment out (or delete) the offending code = (note: *properly-sytaxed*, but just RAM-hungry code), then upon reload = in the browser, Webdna keeps serving up an old copy of the file.. a copy = which no longer exists on disk. And all this while webdna caching is = turned OFF in the admin interface. I KNOW others beside myself have = seen this. And I am not talking about a page that tries to use all 6GB = of RAM that is sitting idle/available... (or so one would reasonably = think).. but just code that pushes the limit just a little too far. Sound too fuzzy? Sure; it is hard to quantify, and describe, since I = can't see under the webdna engine hood to know exactly what is = happening. I tried to make my last post useful but just saying, effectively, "Hey, = in case your page never loads, and your webdna cache seems to be stuck = (for that page), then see if you are defining and calling a function = within another function." HTH -Govinda=
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>> webdna's allotted ram-usage limit for lack of a better term, I called it that ("webdna's allotted = ram-usage limit"). Let me explain: Obviously the company line is that the only limit is the amount of RAM = on the server machine. But coding aggressively has for some/many of us revealed a phenomena - = that a page which tries to use "more RAM than what we usually gobble up = with our code", can, when hit with the browser, simply never load in the = browser.. and even if we then comment out (or delete) the offending code = (note: *properly-sytaxed*, but just RAM-hungry code), then upon reload = in the browser, Webdna keeps serving up an old copy of the file.. a copy = which no longer exists on disk. And all this while webdna caching is = turned OFF in the admin interface. I KNOW others beside myself have = seen this. And I am not talking about a page that tries to use all 6GB = of RAM that is sitting idle/available... (or so one would reasonably = think).. but just code that pushes the limit just a little too far. Sound too fuzzy? Sure; it is hard to quantify, and describe, since I = can't see under the webdna engine hood to know exactly what is = happening. I tried to make my last post useful but just saying, effectively, "Hey, = in case your page never loads, and your webdna cache seems to be stuck = (for that page), then see if you are defining and calling a function = within another function." HTH -Govinda=
Govinda
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
(no subject) (1997)
FW: ANother SHOWIF problem (1997)
multiple search commands (1997)
RE: Re:Signal Raised (1997)
Extract my page name (2006)
Loop code problem (2000)
change the number format (1997)
Online reference (1997)
using listfiles to build a database? more (2000)
installing webcatalog problem. HELP! (1998)
Help name our technology! I found it (1997)
Showif date range comparison (1999)
Using the sendmail command on CGate Pro (Unix) (2000)
[WebDNA] macOS 10.13.3 and WebDNA Mac Server 8.5.1 - hick-up (2019)
[WebDNA] Version 8 (2014)
Date Formats (1997)
Help name our technology! (1997)
new WebDNA 5 command reference (2003)
apparently to problem isolated (1997)
[WebDNA] [lookup returning nothing at all.. not even the notfound param. (2010)