Re: [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 / WebDNA Server 8.?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2014
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 111794
interpreted = N
texte = [VERSION] =91should=92 do thatRegardsStuart TremainIDFK Web DevelopmentsAUSTRALIAwebdna@idfk.com.au> On 20 Dec 2014, at 9:31 am, Kenneth Grome
=wrote:>=20> I specified "Server" twice, once in the subject and again in the> body. But I could not specify the version number (thus the> question marks in both the subject and body), here's why:>=20> Chris sent me the first version/build that was supposed to run on> Ubuntu 14.04. I discovered a couple bugs after installing and> running it for the first time so I reported these issues. It> didn't take him long to fix them both and send me a new build.>=20> However ...>=20> The new build did not come with a version number or a build number> that I am aware of, so I have no idea how to refer to it -- other> than to say that it is the first bug-fixed version built and sent> to me after I first used the new Ubuntu 14.04 installer.>=20> Maybe the take-away here is that WSC can probably do a better job> of clearly and uniquely numbering every build they produce. Then> we can specify the build number when we have issues to report.>=20> There's another benefit to uniquely numbering each build too:>=20> We will never have to specify "Server" or "FastCGI" or platform> any more because WSC will immediately know which one we are having> problems with simply by looking at the unique build number we give> them.>=20> So now I have a question:>=20> Isn't it possible to bury a unique build number inside the> executable itself, and then run a command that returns that build> number?>=20> It seems to me that Chris gave me instructions for doing this in> an earlier version, but as far as I know it is not common> knowledge. In fact I have no idea if it would even work on the> latest builds -- but if it does we should all learn how to do it> -- so we can use a simple command to look up the exact build we> are having trouble with.>=20> Regards,> Kenneth Grome> WebDNA Solutions> http://www.webdnasolutions.com> Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management>=20>=20> On 12/19/2014 04:03 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote:>> This was fixed way back in the beta FastCGI, then I believe it=20>> was fixed in the Server platform as well (off the top of my=20>> head).>>=20>> However, it=92s not impossible that a certain build missed the=20>> fix. That=92s why when reporting bugs that you should always>> list Server/FastCGI [platform] [version], etc..>>=20>> Donovan>>=20>>=20>>=20>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 3:54 PM, iPhonzie@G =20>> wrote:>>=20>>> [createdate] hasn=92t worked since WebCatalog was ported to=20>>> *nix=85 it has always returned the =93last opened date=94 rather=20>>> than the file creation date. I=92m pretty sure I reported this=20>>> to Smith Micro a decade ago. I=92m running WebDNA 6, so I>>> don=92t know if it was ever fixed in a more recent build.>>>=20>>> -- Brian Fries Sent with Airmail>>>=20>>> On December 19, 2014 at 1:40:51 PM, Donovan Brooke=20>>> (dbrooke@euca.us) wrote:>>>=20>>>> Would this be Server or FastCGI?>>>>=20>>>> Donovan>>>>=20>>>>=20>>>>=20>>>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Kenneth Grome=20>>>> wrote:>>>>=20>>>>> I'm using a bug-fixed version of WebDNA (Server 8.?) on=20>>>>> Ubuntu 14.04 and I just discovered that [createdate]=20>>>>> displays today's date on all files inside a [listfiles]=20>>>>> context ... but the [moddate] tag seems to work okay.>>>>>=20>>>>> Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions=20>>>>> http://www.webdnasolutions.com Web Database Systems and=20>>>>> Linux Server Management> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
[version] =91should=92 do thatRegardsStuart TremainIDFK Web DevelopmentsAUSTRALIAwebdna@idfk.com.au> On 20 Dec 2014, at 9:31 am, Kenneth Grome =wrote:>=20> I specified "Server" twice, once in the subject and again in the> body. But I could not specify the version number (thus the> question marks in both the subject and body), here's why:>=20> Chris sent me the first version/build that was supposed to run on> Ubuntu 14.04. I discovered a couple bugs after installing and> running it for the first time so I reported these issues. It> didn't take him long to fix them both and send me a new build.>=20> However ...>=20> The new build did not come with a version number or a build number> that I am aware of, so I have no idea how to refer to it -- other> than to say that it is the first bug-fixed version built and sent> to me after I first used the new Ubuntu 14.04 installer.>=20> Maybe the take-away here is that WSC can probably do a better job> of clearly and uniquely numbering every build they produce. Then> we can specify the build number when we have issues to report.>=20> There's another benefit to uniquely numbering each build too:>=20> We will never have to specify "Server" or "FastCGI" or platform> any more because WSC will immediately know which one we are having> problems with simply by looking at the unique build number we give> them.>=20> So now I have a question:>=20> Isn't it possible to bury a unique build number inside the> executable itself, and then run a command that returns that build> number?>=20> It seems to me that Chris gave me instructions for doing this in> an earlier version, but as far as I know it is not common> knowledge. In fact I have no idea if it would even work on the> latest builds -- but if it does we should all learn how to do it> -- so we can use a simple command to look up the exact build we> are having trouble with.>=20> Regards,> Kenneth Grome> WebDNA Solutions> http://www.webdnasolutions.com> Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management>=20>=20> On 12/19/2014 04:03 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote:>> This was fixed way back in the beta FastCGI, then I believe it=20>> was fixed in the Server platform as well (off the top of my=20>> head).>>=20>> However, it=92s not impossible that a certain build missed the=20>> fix. That=92s why when reporting bugs that you should always>> list Server/FastCGI [platform] [version], etc..>>=20>> Donovan>>=20>>=20>>=20>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 3:54 PM, iPhonzie@G =20>> wrote:>>=20>>> [createdate] hasn=92t worked since WebCatalog was ported to=20>>> *nix=85 it has always returned the =93last opened date=94 rather=20>>> than the file creation date. I=92m pretty sure I reported this=20>>> to Smith Micro a decade ago. I=92m running WebDNA 6, so I>>> don=92t know if it was ever fixed in a more recent build.>>>=20>>> -- Brian Fries Sent with Airmail>>>=20>>> On December 19, 2014 at 1:40:51 PM, Donovan Brooke=20>>> (dbrooke@euca.us) wrote:>>>=20>>>> Would this be Server or FastCGI?>>>>=20>>>> Donovan>>>>=20>>>>=20>>>>=20>>>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Kenneth Grome=20>>>> wrote:>>>>=20>>>>> I'm using a bug-fixed version of WebDNA (Server 8.?) on=20>>>>> Ubuntu 14.04 and I just discovered that [createdate]=20>>>>> displays today's date on all files inside a [listfiles]=20>>>>> context ... but the [moddate] tag seems to work okay.>>>>>=20>>>>> Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions=20>>>>> http://www.webdnasolutions.com Web Database Systems and=20>>>>> Linux Server Management> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Stuart Tremain
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
spawn (1998)
What am I doing wrong? (2000)
Tab Delimited Files / FM Pro (1997)
UPS Calculator (2003)
[WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (2012)
Thanks and Big News!!! (1997)
Random Generator (2005)
profiles (1999)
Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997)
View order not right (1997)
Summing fields (1997)
Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997)
[WebDNA] mail header timezone problem (2008)
Adding content advice needed (1998)
Smith Micro Support powerd by PHP (2006)
A little syntax help (1997)
WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997)
Spaces causing netscape to act weird . . . (2002)
Bug or syntax error on my part? (1997)
Error with [applescript] (1999)