Re: [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 / WebDNA Server 8.?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2014


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 111794
interpreted = N
texte = [VERSION] =91should=92 do that Regards Stuart Tremain IDFK Web Developments AUSTRALIA webdna@idfk.com.au > On 20 Dec 2014, at 9:31 am, Kenneth Grome = wrote: >=20 > I specified "Server" twice, once in the subject and again in the > body. But I could not specify the version number (thus the > question marks in both the subject and body), here's why: >=20 > Chris sent me the first version/build that was supposed to run on > Ubuntu 14.04. I discovered a couple bugs after installing and > running it for the first time so I reported these issues. It > didn't take him long to fix them both and send me a new build. >=20 > However ... >=20 > The new build did not come with a version number or a build number > that I am aware of, so I have no idea how to refer to it -- other > than to say that it is the first bug-fixed version built and sent > to me after I first used the new Ubuntu 14.04 installer. >=20 > Maybe the take-away here is that WSC can probably do a better job > of clearly and uniquely numbering every build they produce. Then > we can specify the build number when we have issues to report. >=20 > There's another benefit to uniquely numbering each build too: >=20 > We will never have to specify "Server" or "FastCGI" or platform > any more because WSC will immediately know which one we are having > problems with simply by looking at the unique build number we give > them. >=20 > So now I have a question: >=20 > Isn't it possible to bury a unique build number inside the > executable itself, and then run a command that returns that build > number? >=20 > It seems to me that Chris gave me instructions for doing this in > an earlier version, but as far as I know it is not common > knowledge. In fact I have no idea if it would even work on the > latest builds -- but if it does we should all learn how to do it > -- so we can use a simple command to look up the exact build we > are having trouble with. >=20 > Regards, > Kenneth Grome > WebDNA Solutions > http://www.webdnasolutions.com > Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management >=20 >=20 > On 12/19/2014 04:03 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >> This was fixed way back in the beta FastCGI, then I believe it=20 >> was fixed in the Server platform as well (off the top of my=20 >> head). >>=20 >> However, it=92s not impossible that a certain build missed the=20 >> fix. That=92s why when reporting bugs that you should always >> list Server/FastCGI [platform] [version], etc.. >>=20 >> Donovan >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On Dec 19, 2014, at 3:54 PM, iPhonzie@G =20 >> wrote: >>=20 >>> [createdate] hasn=92t worked since WebCatalog was ported to=20 >>> *nix=85 it has always returned the =93last opened date=94 rather=20 >>> than the file creation date. I=92m pretty sure I reported this=20 >>> to Smith Micro a decade ago. I=92m running WebDNA 6, so I >>> don=92t know if it was ever fixed in a more recent build. >>>=20 >>> -- Brian Fries Sent with Airmail >>>=20 >>> On December 19, 2014 at 1:40:51 PM, Donovan Brooke=20 >>> (dbrooke@euca.us) wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Would this be Server or FastCGI? >>>>=20 >>>> Donovan >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Kenneth Grome=20 >>>> wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> I'm using a bug-fixed version of WebDNA (Server 8.?) on=20 >>>>> Ubuntu 14.04 and I just discovered that [createdate]=20 >>>>> displays today's date on all files inside a [listfiles]=20 >>>>> context ... but the [moddate] tag seems to work okay. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions=20 >>>>> http://www.webdnasolutions.com Web Database Systems and=20 >>>>> Linux Server Management > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 / WebDNA Server 8.? (Stuart Tremain 2014)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 / WebDNA Server 8.? (Michael Davis 2014)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 / WebDNA Server 8.? (Stuart Tremain 2014)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 / WebDNA Server 8.? (Donovan Brooke 2014)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 / WebDNA Server 8.? (Donovan Brooke 2014)
[version] =91should=92 do that Regards Stuart Tremain IDFK Web Developments AUSTRALIA webdna@idfk.com.au > On 20 Dec 2014, at 9:31 am, Kenneth Grome = wrote: >=20 > I specified "Server" twice, once in the subject and again in the > body. But I could not specify the version number (thus the > question marks in both the subject and body), here's why: >=20 > Chris sent me the first version/build that was supposed to run on > Ubuntu 14.04. I discovered a couple bugs after installing and > running it for the first time so I reported these issues. It > didn't take him long to fix them both and send me a new build. >=20 > However ... >=20 > The new build did not come with a version number or a build number > that I am aware of, so I have no idea how to refer to it -- other > than to say that it is the first bug-fixed version built and sent > to me after I first used the new Ubuntu 14.04 installer. >=20 > Maybe the take-away here is that WSC can probably do a better job > of clearly and uniquely numbering every build they produce. Then > we can specify the build number when we have issues to report. >=20 > There's another benefit to uniquely numbering each build too: >=20 > We will never have to specify "Server" or "FastCGI" or platform > any more because WSC will immediately know which one we are having > problems with simply by looking at the unique build number we give > them. >=20 > So now I have a question: >=20 > Isn't it possible to bury a unique build number inside the > executable itself, and then run a command that returns that build > number? >=20 > It seems to me that Chris gave me instructions for doing this in > an earlier version, but as far as I know it is not common > knowledge. In fact I have no idea if it would even work on the > latest builds -- but if it does we should all learn how to do it > -- so we can use a simple command to look up the exact build we > are having trouble with. >=20 > Regards, > Kenneth Grome > WebDNA Solutions > http://www.webdnasolutions.com > Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management >=20 >=20 > On 12/19/2014 04:03 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >> This was fixed way back in the beta FastCGI, then I believe it=20 >> was fixed in the Server platform as well (off the top of my=20 >> head). >>=20 >> However, it=92s not impossible that a certain build missed the=20 >> fix. That=92s why when reporting bugs that you should always >> list Server/FastCGI [platform] [version], etc.. >>=20 >> Donovan >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On Dec 19, 2014, at 3:54 PM, iPhonzie@G =20 >> wrote: >>=20 >>> [createdate] hasn=92t worked since WebCatalog was ported to=20 >>> *nix=85 it has always returned the =93last opened date=94 rather=20 >>> than the file creation date. I=92m pretty sure I reported this=20 >>> to Smith Micro a decade ago. I=92m running WebDNA 6, so I >>> don=92t know if it was ever fixed in a more recent build. >>>=20 >>> -- Brian Fries Sent with Airmail >>>=20 >>> On December 19, 2014 at 1:40:51 PM, Donovan Brooke=20 >>> (dbrooke@euca.us) wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Would this be Server or FastCGI? >>>>=20 >>>> Donovan >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Kenneth Grome=20 >>>> wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> I'm using a bug-fixed version of WebDNA (Server 8.?) on=20 >>>>> Ubuntu 14.04 and I just discovered that [createdate]=20 >>>>> displays today's date on all files inside a [listfiles]=20 >>>>> context ... but the [moddate] tag seems to work okay. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions=20 >>>>> http://www.webdnasolutions.com Web Database Systems and=20 >>>>> Linux Server Management > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Stuart Tremain

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

spawn (1998) What am I doing wrong? (2000) Tab Delimited Files / FM Pro (1997) UPS Calculator (2003) [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (2012) Thanks and Big News!!! (1997) Random Generator (2005) profiles (1999) Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997) View order not right (1997) Summing fields (1997) Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997) [WebDNA] mail header timezone problem (2008) Adding content advice needed (1998) Smith Micro Support powerd by PHP (2006) A little syntax help (1997) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) Spaces causing netscape to act weird . . . (2002) Bug or syntax error on my part? (1997) Error with [applescript] (1999)