[WebDNA] Re: possible bug? (db field named [width])

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108196
interpreted = N
texte = please use [ListFields] to display the field data.. alongside a separate = table display that does not use [ListFields].. to see what i am seeing: > version=3D6.2 > platform=3Dunix-Linux Intel >=20 > In case anyone is inclined: > please help me confirm: > make a db with a field named [width]..plus other fields >=20 > populate them all, several records...=20 >=20 > search the db.. and display all records' field data to the web page. >=20 > The only way I could get the value of the [width] field is with = [::width] (see manual on "scope"). >=20 > But I don't understand why we should need to step up a level of scope = to get [width]. ?! >=20 > At first I thought it was a collision with a [fileinfo] tag = (somehow).. but I am not using that here. and anyway that tag is named = [imagewidth]. >=20 > Is it way too late and I am being dumb (on top of blurry-eyed)? ... or = is it way too late, but this is still nevertheless a bug? >=20 > -Govinda Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (William DeVaul 2012)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) ("Psi Prime Inc, Matthew A Perosi " 2012)
  10. [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
please use [listfields] to display the field data.. alongside a separate = table display that does not use [listfields].. to see what i am seeing: > version=3D6.2 > platform=3Dunix-Linux Intel >=20 > In case anyone is inclined: > please help me confirm: > make a db with a field named [width]..plus other fields >=20 > populate them all, several records...=20 >=20 > search the db.. and display all records' field data to the web page. >=20 > The only way I could get the value of the [width] field is with = [::width] (see manual on "scope"). >=20 > But I don't understand why we should need to step up a level of scope = to get [width]. ?! >=20 > At first I thought it was a collision with a [fileinfo] tag = (somehow).. but I am not using that here. and anyway that tag is named = [imagewidth]. >=20 > Is it way too late and I am being dumb (on top of blurry-eyed)? ... or = is it way too late, but this is still nevertheless a bug? >=20 > -Govinda Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Security Issue (1997) Setting up WebCatalog with Retail Pro data (1996) Apache processes (2003) WebCatalog Hosting (1996) Sendmail Context (2003) [OT] Xserve (2002) All orders are failing (2002) Item options w/ price adjustment (1997) New syntax feedback for 4.0 (2000) Just Testing (1997) unsubscribe (1997) WebCat2b12 - nesting [tags] (1997) Problem with [Search] inside of [Loop]? (1997) [WriteFile] problems (1997) apostrophe in search item (1997) Bug in WebCat, (2000) [shownext max=?] armed (1997) FS WebCatalaog license (2000) errormessages.db (1997) shipcost - cleaner with a table (1998)