Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2015


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 112340
interpreted = N
texte = > 8.1.1 might take two months to arrive. No problem. I will just deal with the bcc fields manually. > The temporary solution is a batch find and replace. The batch find is no problem (just use JEdit to find "&bcc=") but batch replace is impossible because I need to do something different things in each case: 1- change the bcc field name to cc 2- append the bcc values to the to field 3- append the bcc values to the cc field 4- use the bcc values in the to field in a duplicate sendmail 5- ? ... and in each case I also need to remove the bcc field and its value(s) since the bcc is the cause of these problems. Therefore I have no choice but to fix each sendmail manually. Thanks Chris! Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions http://www.webdnasolutions.com Web Database Systems and Linux Server Administration On 05/29/2015 03:19 AM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > Hi Ken! > > 8.1.1 might take two months to arrive. We are still working on > the installers before releasing 8.1. Trying to improve, but > this takes time considering our resources. > > The temporary solution is a batch find and replace linux shell > > http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/unix-linux-replace-string-words-in-many-files/ > > > and you will find many other solutions of this type. > > you can also use regexxer, jedit, geany… > > - chris > > > >> On May 28, 2015, at 23:19, Kenneth Grome >> wrote: >> >> Hi Chris, >> >> Thanks for the quick reply. >> >> Will 8.1.1 be ready in a couple days, or is this something >> that won't be fixed for weeks or months? >> >> The reason I ask is because I have TONS of [sendmail] >> contexts in my client's code, and almost all of them are >> failing because of my extensive use of BCC fields. >> >> :( >> >> So if you cannot fix this problem very soon it means I must >> proceed with a very time-consuming work-around: >> >> Manually remove all my BCC fields then duplicate each >> [sendmail] context using the former BCC addresses in the >> "TO" field. >> >> This is a work-around project I would love to avoid if >> you're able to fix this problem immediately ... ? >> >> Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions >> http://www.webdnasolutions.com Web Database Systems and >> Linux Server Administration >> >> >> On 05/28/2015 03:00 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us >> wrote: >>> Noted. We will check this and fix it for 8.1.1 >>> >>> - chris >>> >>> >>>> On May 28, 2015, at 21:01, Kenneth Grome >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> This bug was reported by Diane Blackwell on 31 Oct 2012 >>>> but I could not find any replies to her bug report in >>>> the archives, nor can I recall WSC saying they fixed >>>> this problem: >>>> >>>>> Have found a bug with the emailer in >>>>> WebDNA_6.2.1_x86_64deb. It works fine without the BCC >>>>> line, but when a BCC line is added, it sends the email >>>>> with (oh here they are) random characters in the 'to' >>>>> address, no subject and three repeating lines of code >>>>> from the body. >>>> >>>> This bug still exists in both 8.02 and 8.1 on my latest >>>> Ubuntu 14.04 server. >>>> >>>> I guess there's no sense in my asking for an earlier >>>> version of 8.x to see if it exists on those versions. >>>> After all, if this bug has existed since 6.2.1 then it >>>> only makes sense that it still exists in all versions >>>> since. >>>> >>>> However, this is a bizarre situation because I was using >>>> 8.1 on another Ubuntu 14.04 server and it was working >>>> perfectly fine with a bcc field in most of my [sendmail] >>>> tags. So it seems that this is not a problem on all >>>> servers. >>>> >>>> I moved the website from that server to a new server >>>> last week. That's when this problem started. I cannot >>>> explain why it suddenly appeared on the new server >>>> without ever appearing on the old server, but now my >>>> client wonders if I can fix it -- and right now my only >>>> apparent option is to remove the bcc field from every >>>> [sendmail] context on the new server. Not a desirable >>>> task to say the least ... and not something that should >>>> be necessary given the fact that we are supposed to be >>>> able to use any headers we feel like using in our >>>> [sendmail] tags, theoretically without causing WebDNA's >>>> internal code to create such problems! >>>> >>>> It seems like something must be wrong with the internal >>>> code that generates email messages from our email files. >>>> This is why I think we need the C++ programmer of WebDNA >>>> to figure out what might be causing this problem. Maybe >>>> he can track it down and squash this bug some day soon? >>>> >>>> My problem is very much as Diane described it: >>>> >>>> Sendmail mucks up the message when using a bcc field. >>>> In my case it sometimes causes the subject field to be >>>> blank while other times it just screws up the subject >>>> text ... and it always seems to screw up the body of the >>>> message, sometimes repeating sections of text 2-3 times >>>> or leaving sections out entirely. >>>> >>>> HELP!!! >>>> >>>> Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions >>>> http://www.webdnasolutions.com Web Database Systems and >>>> Linux Server Administration >>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>>> the mailing list . To unsubscribe, >>>> E-mail to: archives: >>>> http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: >>>> support@webdna.us >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail >>> to: archives: >>> http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: >>> support@webdna.us >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail >> to: archives: >> http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: >> support@webdna.us > > --------------------------------------------------------- This > message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the > mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: > http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: > support@webdna.us > Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (Stuart Tremain 2017)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (Diane Blackmore 2015)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2015)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (Stuart Tremain 2015)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2015)
  9. [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (Kenneth Grome 2015)
> 8.1.1 might take two months to arrive. No problem. I will just deal with the bcc fields manually. > The temporary solution is a batch find and replace. The batch find is no problem (just use JEdit to find "&bcc=") but batch replace is impossible because I need to do something different things in each case: 1- change the bcc field name to cc 2- append the bcc values to the to field 3- append the bcc values to the cc field 4- use the bcc values in the to field in a duplicate sendmail 5- ? ... and in each case I also need to remove the bcc field and its value(s) since the bcc is the cause of these problems. Therefore I have no choice but to fix each sendmail manually. Thanks Chris! Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions http://www.webdnasolutions.com Web Database Systems and Linux Server Administration On 05/29/2015 03:19 AM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > Hi Ken! > > 8.1.1 might take two months to arrive. We are still working on > the installers before releasing 8.1. Trying to improve, but > this takes time considering our resources. > > The temporary solution is a batch find and replace linux shell > > http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/unix-linux-replace-string-words-in-many-files/ > > > and you will find many other solutions of this type. > > you can also use regexxer, jedit, geany… > > - chris > > > >> On May 28, 2015, at 23:19, Kenneth Grome >> wrote: >> >> Hi Chris, >> >> Thanks for the quick reply. >> >> Will 8.1.1 be ready in a couple days, or is this something >> that won't be fixed for weeks or months? >> >> The reason I ask is because I have TONS of [sendmail] >> contexts in my client's code, and almost all of them are >> failing because of my extensive use of BCC fields. >> >> :( >> >> So if you cannot fix this problem very soon it means I must >> proceed with a very time-consuming work-around: >> >> Manually remove all my BCC fields then duplicate each >> [sendmail] context using the former BCC addresses in the >> "TO" field. >> >> This is a work-around project I would love to avoid if >> you're able to fix this problem immediately ... ? >> >> Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions >> http://www.webdnasolutions.com Web Database Systems and >> Linux Server Administration >> >> >> On 05/28/2015 03:00 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us >> wrote: >>> Noted. We will check this and fix it for 8.1.1 >>> >>> - chris >>> >>> >>>> On May 28, 2015, at 21:01, Kenneth Grome >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> This bug was reported by Diane Blackwell on 31 Oct 2012 >>>> but I could not find any replies to her bug report in >>>> the archives, nor can I recall WSC saying they fixed >>>> this problem: >>>> >>>>> Have found a bug with the emailer in >>>>> WebDNA_6.2.1_x86_64deb. It works fine without the BCC >>>>> line, but when a BCC line is added, it sends the email >>>>> with (oh here they are) random characters in the 'to' >>>>> address, no subject and three repeating lines of code >>>>> from the body. >>>> >>>> This bug still exists in both 8.02 and 8.1 on my latest >>>> Ubuntu 14.04 server. >>>> >>>> I guess there's no sense in my asking for an earlier >>>> version of 8.x to see if it exists on those versions. >>>> After all, if this bug has existed since 6.2.1 then it >>>> only makes sense that it still exists in all versions >>>> since. >>>> >>>> However, this is a bizarre situation because I was using >>>> 8.1 on another Ubuntu 14.04 server and it was working >>>> perfectly fine with a bcc field in most of my [sendmail] >>>> tags. So it seems that this is not a problem on all >>>> servers. >>>> >>>> I moved the website from that server to a new server >>>> last week. That's when this problem started. I cannot >>>> explain why it suddenly appeared on the new server >>>> without ever appearing on the old server, but now my >>>> client wonders if I can fix it -- and right now my only >>>> apparent option is to remove the bcc field from every >>>> [sendmail] context on the new server. Not a desirable >>>> task to say the least ... and not something that should >>>> be necessary given the fact that we are supposed to be >>>> able to use any headers we feel like using in our >>>> [sendmail] tags, theoretically without causing WebDNA's >>>> internal code to create such problems! >>>> >>>> It seems like something must be wrong with the internal >>>> code that generates email messages from our email files. >>>> This is why I think we need the C++ programmer of WebDNA >>>> to figure out what might be causing this problem. Maybe >>>> he can track it down and squash this bug some day soon? >>>> >>>> My problem is very much as Diane described it: >>>> >>>> Sendmail mucks up the message when using a bcc field. >>>> In my case it sometimes causes the subject field to be >>>> blank while other times it just screws up the subject >>>> text ... and it always seems to screw up the body of the >>>> message, sometimes repeating sections of text 2-3 times >>>> or leaving sections out entirely. >>>> >>>> HELP!!! >>>> >>>> Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions >>>> http://www.webdnasolutions.com Web Database Systems and >>>> Linux Server Administration >>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>>> the mailing list . To unsubscribe, >>>> E-mail to: archives: >>>> http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: >>>> support@webdna.us >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail >>> to: archives: >>> http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: >>> support@webdna.us >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail >> to: archives: >> http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: >> support@webdna.us > > --------------------------------------------------------- This > message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the > mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: > http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: > support@webdna.us > Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

searching for items that begin with a number (2004) shipcost (1997) Web*SSL and WebCatalog (1997) Sorting by date (1997) Search in 2 or more catalogs (1997) WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997) Checking for blank form fields (sort of...) (1998) Emailer (2000) NT error logs (1997) Smart caching problems with 2.1b3? (1997) Test (2002) remotely creating and populating a stock inventory db -almostthere! (1999) WebCatalog 3.0.8 is on FTP... (2000) can WC render sites out? (1997) WebCat editing, SiteGuard & SiteEdit (1997) [WriteFile] problems (1997) shell problems again... (2003) Error Msg (1998) Nesting format tags (1997) Multiple catalog databases and showcart (1997)