Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2015


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 112336
interpreted = N
texte = Hi Chris, Thanks for the quick reply. Will 8.1.1 be ready in a couple days, or is this something that won't be fixed for weeks or months? The reason I ask is because I have TONS of [sendmail] contexts in my client's code, and almost all of them are failing because of my extensive use of BCC fields. :( So if you cannot fix this problem very soon it means I must proceed with a very time-consuming work-around: Manually remove all my BCC fields then duplicate each [sendmail] context using the former BCC addresses in the "TO" field. This is a work-around project I would love to avoid if you're able to fix this problem immediately ... ? Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions http://www.webdnasolutions.com Web Database Systems and Linux Server Administration On 05/28/2015 03:00 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > Noted. We will check this and fix it for 8.1.1 > > - chris > > >> On May 28, 2015, at 21:01, Kenneth Grome wrote: >> >> This bug was reported by Diane Blackwell on 31 Oct 2012 but I >> could not find any replies to her bug report in the archives, nor >> can I recall WSC saying they fixed this problem: >> >>> Have found a bug with the emailer in WebDNA_6.2.1_x86_64deb. It >>> works fine without the BCC line, but when a BCC line is added, >>> it sends the email with (oh here they are) random characters in >>> the 'to' address, no subject and three repeating lines of code >>> from the body. >> >> This bug still exists in both 8.02 and 8.1 on my latest Ubuntu >> 14.04 server. >> >> I guess there's no sense in my asking for an earlier version of >> 8.x to see if it exists on those versions. After all, if this bug >> has existed since 6.2.1 then it only makes sense that it still >> exists in all versions since. >> >> However, this is a bizarre situation because I was using 8.1 on >> another Ubuntu 14.04 server and it was working perfectly fine with >> a bcc field in most of my [sendmail] tags. So it seems that this >> is not a problem on all servers. >> >> I moved the website from that server to a new server last week. >> That's when this problem started. I cannot explain why it >> suddenly appeared on the new server without ever appearing on the >> old server, but now my client wonders if I can fix it -- and right >> now my only apparent option is to remove the bcc field from every >> [sendmail] context on the new server. Not a desirable task to say >> the least ... and not something that should be necessary given the >> fact that we are supposed to be able to use any headers we feel >> like using in our [sendmail] tags, theoretically without causing >> WebDNA's internal code to create such problems! >> >> It seems like something must be wrong with the internal code that >> generates email messages from our email files. This is why I >> think we need the C++ programmer of WebDNA to figure out what >> might be causing this problem. Maybe he can track it down and >> squash this bug some day soon? >> >> My problem is very much as Diane described it: >> >> Sendmail mucks up the message when using a bcc field. In my case >> it sometimes causes the subject field to be blank while other >> times it just screws up the subject text ... and it always seems >> to screw up the body of the message, sometimes repeating sections >> of text 2-3 times or leaving sections out entirely. >> >> HELP!!! >> >> Regards, >> Kenneth Grome >> WebDNA Solutions >> http://www.webdnasolutions.com >> Web Database Systems and Linux Server Administration >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (Stuart Tremain 2017)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (Diane Blackmore 2015)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2015)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (Stuart Tremain 2015)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2015)
  9. [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists (Kenneth Grome 2015)
Hi Chris, Thanks for the quick reply. Will 8.1.1 be ready in a couple days, or is this something that won't be fixed for weeks or months? The reason I ask is because I have TONS of [sendmail] contexts in my client's code, and almost all of them are failing because of my extensive use of BCC fields. :( So if you cannot fix this problem very soon it means I must proceed with a very time-consuming work-around: Manually remove all my BCC fields then duplicate each [sendmail] context using the former BCC addresses in the "TO" field. This is a work-around project I would love to avoid if you're able to fix this problem immediately ... ? Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions http://www.webdnasolutions.com Web Database Systems and Linux Server Administration On 05/28/2015 03:00 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > Noted. We will check this and fix it for 8.1.1 > > - chris > > >> On May 28, 2015, at 21:01, Kenneth Grome wrote: >> >> This bug was reported by Diane Blackwell on 31 Oct 2012 but I >> could not find any replies to her bug report in the archives, nor >> can I recall WSC saying they fixed this problem: >> >>> Have found a bug with the emailer in WebDNA_6.2.1_x86_64deb. It >>> works fine without the BCC line, but when a BCC line is added, >>> it sends the email with (oh here they are) random characters in >>> the 'to' address, no subject and three repeating lines of code >>> from the body. >> >> This bug still exists in both 8.02 and 8.1 on my latest Ubuntu >> 14.04 server. >> >> I guess there's no sense in my asking for an earlier version of >> 8.x to see if it exists on those versions. After all, if this bug >> has existed since 6.2.1 then it only makes sense that it still >> exists in all versions since. >> >> However, this is a bizarre situation because I was using 8.1 on >> another Ubuntu 14.04 server and it was working perfectly fine with >> a bcc field in most of my [sendmail] tags. So it seems that this >> is not a problem on all servers. >> >> I moved the website from that server to a new server last week. >> That's when this problem started. I cannot explain why it >> suddenly appeared on the new server without ever appearing on the >> old server, but now my client wonders if I can fix it -- and right >> now my only apparent option is to remove the bcc field from every >> [sendmail] context on the new server. Not a desirable task to say >> the least ... and not something that should be necessary given the >> fact that we are supposed to be able to use any headers we feel >> like using in our [sendmail] tags, theoretically without causing >> WebDNA's internal code to create such problems! >> >> It seems like something must be wrong with the internal code that >> generates email messages from our email files. This is why I >> think we need the C++ programmer of WebDNA to figure out what >> might be causing this problem. Maybe he can track it down and >> squash this bug some day soon? >> >> My problem is very much as Diane described it: >> >> Sendmail mucks up the message when using a bcc field. In my case >> it sometimes causes the subject field to be blank while other >> times it just screws up the subject text ... and it always seems >> to screw up the body of the message, sometimes repeating sections >> of text 2-3 times or leaving sections out entirely. >> >> HELP!!! >> >> Regards, >> Kenneth Grome >> WebDNA Solutions >> http://www.webdnasolutions.com >> Web Database Systems and Linux Server Administration >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Sorting error (1997) shipcost (1997) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) FAX orders (1996) Can't Update records (1997) [append] and SSL (1997) [WebDNA] Combining searches with blank and zero values? (2011) WebDNA Solutions ... sorry! (1997) Stats (2004) listfiles-looking for slick solution (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - More limits on [include] (1997) WebDelivery downloads alias, not original ? (1997) [WebDNA] sudo WebCatalogCtl stop won't work (2016) Tables (2005) carriage returns in data (1997) [WebDNA] Need Help Installing on Linux (2014) Windows 95/NT tip of the month (1998) Lock out multiple users with same password? (1999) RequiredFields template (1997) What am I missing (1997)