Re: [WebDNA] Sendmail BCC bug still exists
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2015
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 112336
interpreted = N
texte = Hi Chris,Thanks for the quick reply.Will 8.1.1 be ready in a couple days, or is this something thatwon't be fixed for weeks or months?The reason I ask is because I have TONS of [sendmail] contexts inmy client's code, and almost all of them are failing because of myextensive use of BCC fields.:(So if you cannot fix this problem very soon it means I mustproceed with a very time-consuming work-around:Manually remove all my BCC fields then duplicate each [sendmail]context using the former BCC addresses in the "TO" field.This is a work-around project I would love to avoid if you're ableto fix this problem immediately ... ?Regards,Kenneth GromeWebDNA Solutionshttp://www.webdnasolutions.comWeb Database Systems and Linux Server AdministrationOn 05/28/2015 03:00 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote:> Noted. We will check this and fix it for 8.1.1> > - chris> > >> On May 28, 2015, at 21:01, Kenneth Grome
wrote:>>>> This bug was reported by Diane Blackwell on 31 Oct 2012 but I>> could not find any replies to her bug report in the archives, nor>> can I recall WSC saying they fixed this problem:>>>>> Have found a bug with the emailer in WebDNA_6.2.1_x86_64deb. It>>> works fine without the BCC line, but when a BCC line is added,>>> it sends the email with (oh here they are) random characters in>>> the 'to' address, no subject and three repeating lines of code>>> from the body.>>>> This bug still exists in both 8.02 and 8.1 on my latest Ubuntu>> 14.04 server.>>>> I guess there's no sense in my asking for an earlier version of>> 8.x to see if it exists on those versions. After all, if this bug>> has existed since 6.2.1 then it only makes sense that it still>> exists in all versions since.>>>> However, this is a bizarre situation because I was using 8.1 on>> another Ubuntu 14.04 server and it was working perfectly fine with>> a bcc field in most of my [sendmail] tags. So it seems that this>> is not a problem on all servers.>>>> I moved the website from that server to a new server last week.>> That's when this problem started. I cannot explain why it>> suddenly appeared on the new server without ever appearing on the>> old server, but now my client wonders if I can fix it -- and right>> now my only apparent option is to remove the bcc field from every>> [sendmail] context on the new server. Not a desirable task to say>> the least ... and not something that should be necessary given the>> fact that we are supposed to be able to use any headers we feel>> like using in our [sendmail] tags, theoretically without causing>> WebDNA's internal code to create such problems!>>>> It seems like something must be wrong with the internal code that>> generates email messages from our email files. This is why I>> think we need the C++ programmer of WebDNA to figure out what>> might be causing this problem. Maybe he can track it down and>> squash this bug some day soon?>>>> My problem is very much as Diane described it:>>>> Sendmail mucks up the message when using a bcc field. In my case>> it sometimes causes the subject field to be blank while other>> times it just screws up the subject text ... and it always seems>> to screw up the body of the message, sometimes repeating sections>> of text 2-3 times or leaving sections out entirely.>>>> HELP!!!>>>> Regards,>> Kenneth Grome>> WebDNA Solutions>> http://www.webdnasolutions.com>> Web Database Systems and Linux Server Administration>> --------------------------------------------------------->> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list .>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us>> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us> > ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us>
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Hi Chris,Thanks for the quick reply.Will 8.1.1 be ready in a couple days, or is this something thatwon't be fixed for weeks or months?The reason I ask is because I have TONS of [sendmail] contexts inmy client's code, and almost all of them are failing because of myextensive use of BCC fields.:(So if you cannot fix this problem very soon it means I mustproceed with a very time-consuming work-around:Manually remove all my BCC fields then duplicate each [sendmail]context using the former BCC addresses in the "TO" field.This is a work-around project I would love to avoid if you're ableto fix this problem immediately ... ?Regards,Kenneth GromeWebDNA Solutionshttp://www.webdnasolutions.comWeb Database Systems and Linux Server AdministrationOn 05/28/2015 03:00 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote:> Noted. We will check this and fix it for 8.1.1> > - chris> > >> On May 28, 2015, at 21:01, Kenneth Grome wrote:>>>> This bug was reported by Diane Blackwell on 31 Oct 2012 but I>> could not find any replies to her bug report in the archives, nor>> can I recall WSC saying they fixed this problem:>>>>> Have found a bug with the emailer in WebDNA_6.2.1_x86_64deb. It>>> works fine without the BCC line, but when a BCC line is added,>>> it sends the email with (oh here they are) random characters in>>> the 'to' address, no subject and three repeating lines of code>>> from the body.>>>> This bug still exists in both 8.02 and 8.1 on my latest Ubuntu>> 14.04 server.>>>> I guess there's no sense in my asking for an earlier version of>> 8.x to see if it exists on those versions. After all, if this bug>> has existed since 6.2.1 then it only makes sense that it still>> exists in all versions since.>>>> However, this is a bizarre situation because I was using 8.1 on>> another Ubuntu 14.04 server and it was working perfectly fine with>> a bcc field in most of my [sendmail] tags. So it seems that this>> is not a problem on all servers.>>>> I moved the website from that server to a new server last week.>> That's when this problem started. I cannot explain why it>> suddenly appeared on the new server without ever appearing on the>> old server, but now my client wonders if I can fix it -- and right>> now my only apparent option is to remove the bcc field from every>> [sendmail] context on the new server. Not a desirable task to say>> the least ... and not something that should be necessary given the>> fact that we are supposed to be able to use any headers we feel>> like using in our [sendmail] tags, theoretically without causing>> WebDNA's internal code to create such problems!>>>> It seems like something must be wrong with the internal code that>> generates email messages from our email files. This is why I>> think we need the C++ programmer of WebDNA to figure out what>> might be causing this problem. Maybe he can track it down and>> squash this bug some day soon?>>>> My problem is very much as Diane described it:>>>> Sendmail mucks up the message when using a bcc field. In my case>> it sometimes causes the subject field to be blank while other>> times it just screws up the subject text ... and it always seems>> to screw up the body of the message, sometimes repeating sections>> of text 2-3 times or leaving sections out entirely.>>>> HELP!!!>>>> Regards,>> Kenneth Grome>> WebDNA Solutions>> http://www.webdnasolutions.com>> Web Database Systems and Linux Server Administration>> --------------------------------------------------------->> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list .>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us>> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us> > ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us>
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Sorting error (1997)
shipcost (1997)
WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997)
FAX orders (1996)
Can't Update records (1997)
[append] and SSL (1997)
[WebDNA] Combining searches with blank and zero values? (2011)
WebDNA Solutions ... sorry! (1997)
Stats (2004)
listfiles-looking for slick solution (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - More limits on [include] (1997)
WebDelivery downloads alias, not original ? (1997)
[WebDNA] sudo WebCatalogCtl stop won't work (2016)
Tables (2005)
carriage returns in data (1997)
[WebDNA] Need Help Installing on Linux (2014)
Windows 95/NT tip of the month (1998)
Lock out multiple users with same password? (1999)
RequiredFields template (1997)
What am I missing (1997)