Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 54355
interpreted = N
texte = >Well...not exactly. The search 'results' are stored in 'variable' which can >be referenced as many times as you want further in the template. > >I do not want to get into details, as we may be changing some of the new >WebDNA token names. But I will say this... We did depart from the >traditional WebDNA search paradigm, in that we did not the new 'founditems' >to be restricted to a containing 'search'. With the new SQL contexts, you >will be able to execute a search query, and store the results as a new >variable object. The you can iterate the SQL records set as often as >needed, referencing the stored record set object. Good move! Are you also adding this feature to standard webdna searches and not just SQL searches? It would be *really nice* to have this as a universal feature and not just limited to SQL ... :) -- Sincerely, Kenneth Grome ------------------------------------------------------------- Outsource your WebDNA programming for $18 an hour or less! ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Scott Anderson" 2003)
  2. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Kenneth Grome 2003)
  3. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Lucas Rockwell 2003)
  4. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Scott Anderson" 2003)
  5. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Scott Anderson" 2003)
  6. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Glenn Busbin 2003)
  7. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Kenneth Grome 2003)
  8. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Clint Davis 2003)
  9. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "flingo" 2003)
  10. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2003)
  11. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Alain Russell 2003)
  12. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  13. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Alain Russell 2003)
  14. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2003)
  15. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Jesse Proudman 2003)
  16. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2003)
  17. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Jesse Proudman 2003)
  18. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Alain Russell 2003)
  19. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Jesse Proudman 2003)
  20. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2003)
  21. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Jesse Proudman 2003)
  22. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2003)
  23. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Matthew A Perosi 2003)
  24. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  25. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Kalin Mintchev 2003)
  26. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Glenn Busbin 2003)
  27. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  28. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Kenneth Grome 2003)
  29. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Stuart Tremain 2003)
  30. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( CN Stuff 2003)
  31. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Alain Russell 2003)
  32. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Scott Anderson" 2003)
  33. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Jesse Proudman 2003)
  34. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Jesse Proudman 2003)
  35. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Scott Anderson" 2003)
  36. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  37. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Kenneth Grome 2003)
  38. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  39. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Kalin Mintchev 2003)
  40. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Jesse Proudman 2003)
  41. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "WebDna @" 2003)
  42. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Kalin Mintchev 2003)
  43. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Andrew Thompson 2003)
  44. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Jesse Proudman 2003)
  45. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Kenneth Grome 2003)
  46. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Jesse Proudman 2003)
  47. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  48. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Kalin Mintchev 2003)
  49. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Jesse Proudman 2003)
  50. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Andrew Thompson 2003)
  51. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Kenneth Grome 2003)
  52. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  53. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Andrew Thompson 2003)
  54. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  55. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Andrew Thompson 2003)
  56. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  57. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Alain Russell 2003)
  58. Re: So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  59. So many lookers, hey smith micro ( Jeff Logan 2003)
>Well...not exactly. The search 'results' are stored in 'variable' which can >be referenced as many times as you want further in the template. > >I do not want to get into details, as we may be changing some of the new >WebDNA token names. But I will say this... We did depart from the >traditional WebDNA search paradigm, in that we did not the new 'founditems' >to be restricted to a containing 'search'. With the new SQL contexts, you >will be able to execute a search query, and store the results as a new >variable object. The you can iterate the SQL records set as often as >needed, referencing the stored record set object. Good move! Are you also adding this feature to standard webdna searches and not just SQL searches? It would be *really nice* to have this as a universal feature and not just limited to SQL ... :) -- Sincerely, Kenneth Grome ------------------------------------------------------------- Outsource your WebDNA programming for $18 an hour or less! ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Using Plug-In while running 1.6.1 (1997) Redirect to _parent? (2002) Text data with spaces in them... (1997) Server problem? (1998) [cart] (1998) Summary layout (1997) Summing fields (1997) WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997) Sandbox Script (2003) ShipCosts database (1997) IE Cache Problems... (1999) [countWords]? (1997) can WC render sites out? (1997) WebDNA Solutions --> Date format suggestions (1998) [raw] & typhoon pro 3.0 or 4.0 (2001) 2.1 Stuff (1998) Re2: frames & carts (1997) Multiple download orders of the same product? (1997) 2nd try: possible to weight results of grouped fields search? (1998) Purchased cart being overwritten (1997)