Re: [WebDNA] CMS in WEBDNA
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2009
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 101882
interpreted = N
texte = I think that the WebDNA CMS would be far far more usable product if it had have been written by one of the wonderful developers that we have in our community rather than someone at SMSI and put it into a lesser version than Enterprise where most owners of WebDNA could use it more effectively. We rebuilt much of the code in the CMS templates a few years ago in an attempt to make it more of a saleable product, during this I found some of the code/concepts needed a bit more polish than it was originally given. We still had problems selling the concept : ( Customers preferring our other CMS products. It has its place but being in the Enterprise edition I think is a bit of an overkill, put it in the ecommerce edition and it would get far greater exposure and could well lead to new users adopting the WebDNA platform. I wonder, has anyone used the CMS in a commercial environment, I would love to see what you have done. My guess is that it is not in use anywhere as I have never seen any discussion about it on "The List" Regards Stuart Tremain IDFK Web Developments AUSTRALIA webdna@idfk.com.au On 03/02/2009, at 5:18 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > Extending my comments on this a bit... :-) > > This morning I had more time to take another look at > this tool. I have to admit that, once I learned a > bit about it, I rather like it. It is actually more compatible > with browsers than I thought! (I use SeaMonkey most > of the time and it works just find in that.. which is > basically FireFox) Also, the > editor is really not that bad at all! It is not > so different than the FCKeditor mentioned earlier. > > Since WSC acquired WebDNA, we have had priorities > to work through, and learning about WebDNA's CMS was not > one that was high up. However, I can say now that > it works, and that I am now more interested in taking > a further look at it to see how it can be improved. > > I've created a forum thread at: forum.webdna.us, > for those of you who have the enterprise edition and > want to talk more about it. > > Donovan > > > > > -- > Donovan D. Brooke PH: 1 (608) 770-3822 > ------------------------------------------------ > VP > WebDNA Software Corporation > 16192 Coastal Highway > Lewes, DE 19958 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list
. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I think that the WebDNA CMS would be far far more usable product if it had have been written by one of the wonderful developers that we have in our community rather than someone at SMSI and put it into a lesser version than Enterprise where most owners of WebDNA could use it more effectively. We rebuilt much of the code in the CMS templates a few years ago in an attempt to make it more of a saleable product, during this I found some of the code/concepts needed a bit more polish than it was originally given. We still had problems selling the concept : ( Customers preferring our other CMS products. It has its place but being in the Enterprise edition I think is a bit of an overkill, put it in the ecommerce edition and it would get far greater exposure and could well lead to new users adopting the WebDNA platform. I wonder, has anyone used the CMS in a commercial environment, I would love to see what you have done. My guess is that it is not in use anywhere as I have never seen any discussion about it on "The List" Regards Stuart Tremain IDFK Web Developments AUSTRALIA webdna@idfk.com.au On 03/02/2009, at 5:18 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > Extending my comments on this a bit... :-) > > This morning I had more time to take another look at > this tool. I have to admit that, once I learned a > bit about it, I rather like it. It is actually more compatible > with browsers than I thought! (I use SeaMonkey most > of the time and it works just find in that.. which is > basically FireFox) Also, the > editor is really not that bad at all! It is not > so different than the FCKeditor mentioned earlier. > > Since WSC acquired WebDNA, we have had priorities > to work through, and learning about WebDNA's CMS was not > one that was high up. However, I can say now that > it works, and that I am now more interested in taking > a further look at it to see how it can be improved. > > I've created a forum thread at: forum.webdna.us, > for those of you who have the enterprise edition and > want to talk more about it. > > Donovan > > > > > -- > Donovan D. Brooke PH: 1 (608) 770-3822 > ------------------------------------------------ > VP > WebDNA Software Corporation > 16192 Coastal Highway > Lewes, DE 19958 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
Stuart Tremain
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
info (1997)
Normalizing Dates and Phone numbers (2000)
ListFiles Bug (1998)
Just Testing (1997)
RequiredFields template (1997)
WebCat & WebTen (1997)
[WebDNA] [OT] Email Server recommendations? (2014)
Cookies Question (2000)
Pull Down Search (2000)
Verifying both name and password (was: THANKS) (1997)
[searchString] (1997)
available times? (2003)
Feature requests (1998)
[interpret] inside the db field? (1997)
Plugin or CGI or both (1997)
[WebDNA] Wishlist: ignore whitespace in database changes (2016)
formulas.db [feature request] (2003)
PIXO (1997)
Server problem? (1998)
Some Questions (1997)