Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 29337
interpreted = N
texte = on 3/20/2000 5:03 PM, Nitai at nitai@eyework.net wrote:> on 21.3.2000 1:47 am, Grant Hulbert at ghulbert@smithmicro.com wrote: > >> [Loop start=1&end=10] >> [index] >> [/Loop] > > I am for this one, since it is already hard enough in a big project to see > what is WebCats code and whats html. > I don't think you're getting the picture. The current code syntax will remain. Grant wants some opinions about the best way to format the new <> based code, which will be used *along side* the current [] based code, not in place of it. Grant, take a look at Maxum's Comparison Operators for NetCloak: http://www.maxum.com/NetCloak/UsersGuide/Std/NC08BComparison.html They take the text approach, using GT for greater than, etc. It works. It's easy to master. They've got a user base that you would love to schmooze over to your product. As I recall, Netcloak is one of the oldest and most widely used Swiss Army Knife type server tools around and their user base had quite a hand in how they chose their syntax. If the <> characters must be avoided, then this approach makes the most sense to me.Mike ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
on 3/20/2000 5:03 PM, Nitai at nitai@eyework.net wrote:> on 21.3.2000 1:47 am, Grant Hulbert at ghulbert@smithmicro.com wrote: > >> [Loop start=1&end=10] >> [index] >> [/Loop] > > I am for this one, since it is already hard enough in a big project to see > what is WebCats code and whats html. > I don't think you're getting the picture. The current code syntax will remain. Grant wants some opinions about the best way to format the new <> based code, which will be used *along side* the current [] based code, not in place of it. Grant, take a look at Maxum's Comparison Operators for NetCloak: http://www.maxum.com/NetCloak/UsersGuide/Std/NC08BComparison.html They take the text approach, using GT for greater than, etc. It works. It's easy to master. They've got a user base that you would love to schmooze over to your product. As I recall, Netcloak is one of the oldest and most widely used Swiss Army Knife type server tools around and their user base had quite a hand in how they chose their syntax. If the <> characters must be avoided, then this approach makes the most sense to me.Mike ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to
Mike Davis
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
More EudoraPro Email Options (1998)
Database changes (1998)
[OT] WebDNA Family Album (2004)
SERIAL NUMBER PROBLEM *AGAIN*!!! (1998)
New command suggestion (1997)
PIXO support (1997)
WebCatalog and Dreamweaver (1999)
forced timeout? (1998)
Nested tags count question (1997)
Adding order weight (1999)
[WebDNA] Protect TextArea and other Input-Fields with WebDNA - Something to talk about ;) (2009)
test for John (1999)
ShowNext Command (1997)
Date search bug? (1998)
[searchString] (1997)
Still Pulling my hair out (2001)
weird G3 happenings (1998)
protect tag on NT IIS (1997)
[WebDNA] special chars (2009)
Web Catalog 2 demo (1997)