Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 29475
interpreted = N
texte = >>
>> >> >> >> This works well for most contexts, but there are a few exceptions >> that can confuse most parsers. Specifically, ShowIf can contain >> characters like > which look just like HTML to a parser: >> >>
3> >> ^ looks a lot like followed by a 3 > >Shouldn't the parser leave stuff between alone until >webcat has substituted HTML the parser can deal with? Yes but you're missing the point. Grant is concerned about the > character being used inside the TAG, not inside the CONTEXT. Look, this illustrates the use of > inside the tag:3> ... stuff here ... The problem here is that webcat will think that the tag is instead of 3>. So the solution is to make webcat understand that the first > character in this tag is a comparison operator and that it does NOT mark the end of the tag. And that would be a hassle to code, thus the reason for my simple solution ...Just use a different comparison operator!Obviously if webcat's language recognized some character OTHER THAN > to mean greater than, this would not even be an issue.It's a lot better to use a different character for the greater than operator than to develop a bunch of new syntax for us to have to learn, that's why I suggested using ) or } instead of > as the greater than comparison operator. Then the webdna language would understand that ) or } means greater than, and this would be a non-issue.The solution would then be to use the same syntax we have always used, with the simple substitution of ONE CHARACTER, like this: ... stuff here ... ... or like this: ... stuff here ... ================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>> >> >> >> >> This works well for most contexts, but there are a few exceptions >> that can confuse most parsers. Specifically, ShowIf can contain >> characters like > which look just like HTML to a parser: >> >> 3> >> ^ looks a lot like followed by a 3 > >Shouldn't the parser leave stuff between alone until >webcat has substituted HTML the parser can deal with? Yes but you're missing the point. Grant is concerned about the > character being used inside the TAG, not inside the CONTEXT. Look, this illustrates the use of > inside the tag:3> ... stuff here ... The problem here is that webcat will think that the tag is instead of 3>. So the solution is to make webcat understand that the first > character in this tag is a comparison operator and that it does NOT mark the end of the tag. And that would be a hassle to code, thus the reason for my simple solution ...Just use a different comparison operator!Obviously if webcat's language recognized some character OTHER THAN > to mean greater than, this would not even be an issue.It's a lot better to use a different character for the greater than operator than to develop a bunch of new syntax for us to have to learn, that's why I suggested using ) or } instead of > as the greater than comparison operator. Then the webdna language would understand that ) or } means greater than, and this would be a non-issue.The solution would then be to use the same syntax we have always used, with the simple substitution of ONE CHARACTER, like this: ... stuff here ... ... or like this: ... stuff here ... ================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Anyone get WebDNA working on a windows XP Home box? (2006)
Bit off subject -- Faxing orders (1997)
[REPLACE] inside [FOUNDITEMS] (1998)
[OT] International CC processing (2000)
Web Catalog 2 demo (1997)
WebCatalog Technical Reference (1997)
Setting up shop (1997)
Windows nt service pack 3 upgrade (1997)
can WC render sites out? (1997)
WebCat2 - many [carts] on one template page? (1997)
Generating Options for a Form. (1997)
[SearchString] usage (1997)
Error: Too many nested [xxx] contexts (1997)
So [OT] it's not even funny (2003)
Re:Searching for ALL / empty form field (1997)
Storebuilder documentation (2004)
weird G3 happenings (1998)
A helpful tip to avoid pulling an Aaron OT (2000)
sorted cart? (1998)
[BoldWords] WebCat.acgib15Mac (1997)