Re: chat opinion ...

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 42630
interpreted = N
texte = On 8/16/02 8:38 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote:> The chat looks like it was just okay, but it seems as though you > can do a far better job with a new mailing list. What's wrong with this list? I can see doing the chat for the novelty of it and the dynamics of a chat. But is it really useful for development?Robert Minor Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------ Cybermill Communications http://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development and hosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.All your websites are belong to us! ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  2. Re: chat opinion ... (dale's stuff 2002)
  3. Re: chat opinion ... (Gary Krockover 2002)
  4. Re: chat opinion ... (Donovan Brooke 2002)
  5. Re: chat opinion ... (Howard Wolosky 2002)
  6. Re: chat opinion ... (Dan Strong 2002)
  7. Re: chat opinion ... (Donovan Brooke 2002)
  8. Re: chat opinion ... (Gary Krockover 2002)
  9. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  10. Re: chat opinion ... (Dan Strong 2002)
  11. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  12. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  13. Re: chat opinion ... (Gary Krockover 2002)
  14. Re: chat opinion ... (Donovan Brooke 2002)
  15. Re: chat opinion ... (Gary Krockover 2002)
  16. Re: chat opinion ... (Dan Strong 2002)
  17. Re: chat opinion ... (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  18. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  19. chat opinion ... (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  20. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 1996)
On 8/16/02 8:38 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote:> The chat looks like it was just okay, but it seems as though you > can do a far better job with a new mailing list. What's wrong with this list? I can see doing the chat for the novelty of it and the dynamics of a chat. But is it really useful for development?Robert Minor Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------ Cybermill Communications http://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development and hosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.All your websites are belong to us! ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Bob Minor

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[WebDNA] Client wants backup copy of site (2010) Exclamation point (1997) Duplicate Messages (1998) Quickie question on the email templates (1997) RequiredFields template (1997) Help formatting search results w/ table (1997) Note added to [sendmail] in Docs (2004) Exclamation point (1997) [date format] w/in sendmail (1997) WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997) Round UP to nearest 100 (2007) PCS Frames-Default page is solution! (1997) Purchased cart being overwritten - still !?? (1997) searchable list archive (1997) Re1000001: Setting up shop (1997) This list needs a digest: rant, rave... (1997) UPS Shipping (1999) japanese characters (1997) [OT] Change permissions via FTP? (2002) My web page only... (2003)