Re: chat opinion ...
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 42640
interpreted = N
texte = Robert Minor wrote: ============== I prefer the mail list where the mountain comes to muhammed, additionally I can search the archives and follow threads. How is a forum better than the mailing list? I can see it if there are too many participants but as they have recently polled, I don't think we are there yet. ============== From a marketing standpoint (marketing=make more folks aware so they open their wallets), a forum is better, in my opinion, because the discussion is 'out in the open' and more easily accessible to an interested public.And re: mountain to muhammad, I'm sure there would be some form of email notification as most quality boards have this feature.The list is cool, don't get me wrong, but you have to know the secret handshake to get in and, yes, WE all found it, but in order to acquire new business, I think it needs to be more visible. From SM's p.o.v more developers=more business. Gary Krockover wrote: ============== Looks like I'll have to buy at least the developer edition in order to become a Dev I member. I hope that they don't require the purchase of the full $2000 version for the Dev II. I'm not a WebDNA host, I don't need it and the host that I refer my clients to already has his licenses. I'll probably just skip the whole Dev membership thing altogether. Sounds like it's just a way to force the developer's to pay for the license of the full product instead of just being able to developing it for clients. I dunno...rambling... ==============Gary, I'm in the same boat as you, and I bet we even use the same host. I'm not sure these new levels really have any relevance to me, but I'm keeping my eyes peeled.Personally, I don't really care what happens, as long as my pockets get fatter somehow. If a rising tide does, in fact, float all boats, then I'll support SM's tide-rising efforts whole-heartedly. While I DO love WebDNA and all that, I love it a lot more on a full stomach.Speaking of which, I'd better get back to work.-Dan ------------------------------------------- http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Robert Minor wrote: ============== I prefer the mail list where the mountain comes to muhammed, additionally I can search the archives and follow threads. How is a forum better than the mailing list? I can see it if there are too many participants but as they have recently polled, I don't think we are there yet. ============== From a marketing standpoint (marketing=make more folks aware so they open their wallets), a forum is better, in my opinion, because the discussion is 'out in the open' and more easily accessible to an interested public.And re: mountain to muhammad, I'm sure there would be some form of email notification as most quality boards have this feature.The list is cool, don't get me wrong, but you have to know the secret handshake to get in and, yes, WE all found it, but in order to acquire new business, I think it needs to be more visible. From SM's p.o.v more developers=more business. Gary Krockover wrote: ============== Looks like I'll have to buy at least the developer edition in order to become a Dev I member. I hope that they don't require the purchase of the full $2000 version for the Dev II. I'm not a WebDNA host, I don't need it and the host that I refer my clients to already has his licenses. I'll probably just skip the whole Dev membership thing altogether. Sounds like it's just a way to force the developer's to pay for the license of the full product instead of just being able to developing it for clients. I dunno...rambling... ==============Gary, I'm in the same boat as you, and I bet we even use the same host. I'm not sure these new levels really have any relevance to me, but I'm keeping my eyes peeled.Personally, I don't really care what happens, as long as my pockets get fatter somehow. If a rising tide does, in fact, float all boats, then I'll support SM's tide-rising efforts whole-heartedly. While I DO love WebDNA and all that, I love it a lot more on a full stomach.Speaking of which, I'd better get back to work.-Dan ------------------------------------------- http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Dan Strong
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Unique SKU Numbers (2000)
Nitro plugin? (1998)
Web Catalog vs. ICAT (1997)
[referrer] tag (1997)
Multi Actions (1999)
cookies and case (2006)
WC TableGrinder (1997)
Too Much Rootbeer Free Offer (1997)
RE: WebCat name recognition (was MacFinder -- a new WebDNAweb (1998)
UNSUBSCRIBE (2000)
Location of Webcat site in folder hierarchy (1997)
Credit card types (1997)
BadSuffix with 2.1b3 cgi (1997)
Exclamation point (1997)
Forumulas.db & Variables (2002)
Is this possible, WebCat2.0 and checkboxes (1997)
Signal Raised Error (1997)
Webcat DB's over appletalk (2003)
Multipart/alternative e-mail (2003)
[CART] (1997)