Re: [OT] DOD

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 45019
interpreted = N
texte = Dan, On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 05:27 PM, Dan Strong wrote:> FunnelWeb Analyzer is showing from my logs that the US Department of > Defense has been browsing my (and some of my clients') site(s). Is this > accurate? A glitch in FunnelWeb? Most likely it is accurate> I mean, if it's true, I suppose DOD employees like to surf the web too, > but it just seems weird...maybe a new anti-cyberterrorist initiative? And > if so, why me and my clients? Are any of you seeing this activity in your > logs?Here is a snippet from my logs for April-May of this year (other months are similar, this is what I had handy)US Government Domain % pages hits K gsa.gov 22.27% 1,779 28,777 46,551K noaa.gov 21.48% 1,716 14,444 63,965K uscourts.gov 10.59% 846 2,148 17,850K faa.gov 7.73% 617 2,085 11,813K fdic.gov 6.85% 547 1,401 12,221K nih.gov 5.97% 477 3,008 18,792K sannet.gov 5.73% 458 2,820 13,929K neh.gov 3.83% 306 421 4,866K va.gov 3.52% 281 4,053 9,593K ca.gov 3.44% 275 1,611 6,200K senate.gov 3.08% 246 1,037 5,119K loc.gov 1.31% 105 489 2,558K nasa.gov 1.10% 88 279 1,993K blm.gov 0.63% 50 253 1,086K treas.gov 0.53% 42 319 684K sec.gov 0.46% 37 73 694K usgs.gov 0.40% 32 285 938K ssa.gov 0.30% 24 70 655K sedgwick.gov 0.19% 15 39 298K usps.gov 0.13% 10 84 224K hud.gov 0.09% 7 50 152K pppl.gov 0.09% 7 30 126K ftc.gov 0.08% 6 39 204K sandia.gov 0.04% 3 62 170K maricopa.gov 0.04% 3 45 149K peacecorps.gov 0.03% 2 40 83K usda.gov 0.03% 2 23 50K bnl.gov 0.03% 2 21 32K usdoj.gov 0.01% 1 37 40K frb.gov 0.01% 1 27 113K jccbi.gov 0.01% 1 19 35K doe.gov 0.01% 1 3 15K epa.gov 0.00% 0 16 11K opm.gov 0.00% 0 1 0K usitc.gov 0.00% 0 0 0K osha.gov 0.00% 0 0 1K military Domain % pages hits K army.mil 43.25% 1,575 5,981 33,587K navy.mil 41.35% 1,506 4,463 37,540K nipr.mil 15.24% 555 3,348 14,203K disa.mil 0.16% 6 101 195K nima.mil 0.00% 0 1 0K af.mil 0.00% 0 1 0K I usually also see fbi.gov as well, it was kind of interesting that there weren't any during this period. And for anyone that says there are no Gays in the military, the logs above for for a gay male dating site :)> TIA, maybe this is a non-topic, but it just strikes me as odd, that's all > and I'd like to find an/the answer for when my clients start asking.Nothing to worry about, they just have some government employees interested in their sites.> -Dan Dale ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [OT] DOD again *MYSTERY SOLVED* (Alex McCombie 2003)
  2. Re: [OT] DOD again *MYSTERY SOLVED* (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  3. Re: [OT] DOD again *MYSTERY SOLVED* (Dan Strong 2003)
  4. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  5. Re: [OT] DOD again (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  6. Re: [OT] DOD again (SREGALADO@aol.com 2003)
  7. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  8. Re: [OT] DOD again (Frank Nordberg 2003)
  9. Re: [OT] DOD again (Donovan 2003)
  10. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  11. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  12. Re: [OT] DOD again (Gyuri 2003)
  13. Re: [OT] DOD again (Donovan 2003)
  14. Re: [OT] DOD again (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  15. Re: [OT] DOD again (Alex McCombie 2003)
  16. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  17. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  18. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  19. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  20. Re: [OT] DOD again (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  21. Re: [OT] DOD again (Alex McCombie 2003)
  22. Re: [OT] DOD again (Brian Boegershausen 2003)
  23. Re: [OT] DOD again (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  24. Re: [OT] DOD again (Alex McCombie 2003)
  25. Re: [OT] DOD again (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  26. Re: [OT] DOD again (Brian Boegershausen 2003)
  27. [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  28. Re: [OT] DOD (Frank Nordberg 2002)
  29. Re: [OT] DOD (Dan Strong 2002)
  30. Re: [OT] DOD (dale's stuff 2002)
  31. Re: [OT] DOD (Dan Strong 2002)
  32. Re: [OT] DOD (Robert Wade 2002)
  33. Re: [OT] DOD (Gary Krockover 2002)
  34. [OT] DOD (Dan Strong 2002)
Dan, On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 05:27 PM, Dan Strong wrote:> FunnelWeb Analyzer is showing from my logs that the US Department of > Defense has been browsing my (and some of my clients') site(s). Is this > accurate? A glitch in FunnelWeb? Most likely it is accurate> I mean, if it's true, I suppose DOD employees like to surf the web too, > but it just seems weird...maybe a new anti-cyberterrorist initiative? And > if so, why me and my clients? Are any of you seeing this activity in your > logs?Here is a snippet from my logs for April-May of this year (other months are similar, this is what I had handy)US Government Domain % pages hits K gsa.gov 22.27% 1,779 28,777 46,551K noaa.gov 21.48% 1,716 14,444 63,965K uscourts.gov 10.59% 846 2,148 17,850K faa.gov 7.73% 617 2,085 11,813K fdic.gov 6.85% 547 1,401 12,221K nih.gov 5.97% 477 3,008 18,792K sannet.gov 5.73% 458 2,820 13,929K neh.gov 3.83% 306 421 4,866K va.gov 3.52% 281 4,053 9,593K ca.gov 3.44% 275 1,611 6,200K senate.gov 3.08% 246 1,037 5,119K loc.gov 1.31% 105 489 2,558K nasa.gov 1.10% 88 279 1,993K blm.gov 0.63% 50 253 1,086K treas.gov 0.53% 42 319 684K sec.gov 0.46% 37 73 694K usgs.gov 0.40% 32 285 938K ssa.gov 0.30% 24 70 655K sedgwick.gov 0.19% 15 39 298K usps.gov 0.13% 10 84 224K hud.gov 0.09% 7 50 152K pppl.gov 0.09% 7 30 126K ftc.gov 0.08% 6 39 204K sandia.gov 0.04% 3 62 170K maricopa.gov 0.04% 3 45 149K peacecorps.gov 0.03% 2 40 83K usda.gov 0.03% 2 23 50K bnl.gov 0.03% 2 21 32K usdoj.gov 0.01% 1 37 40K frb.gov 0.01% 1 27 113K jccbi.gov 0.01% 1 19 35K doe.gov 0.01% 1 3 15K epa.gov 0.00% 0 16 11K opm.gov 0.00% 0 1 0K usitc.gov 0.00% 0 0 0K osha.gov 0.00% 0 0 1K military Domain % pages hits K army.mil 43.25% 1,575 5,981 33,587K navy.mil 41.35% 1,506 4,463 37,540K nipr.mil 15.24% 555 3,348 14,203K disa.mil 0.16% 6 101 195K nima.mil 0.00% 0 1 0K af.mil 0.00% 0 1 0K I usually also see fbi.gov as well, it was kind of interesting that there weren't any during this period. And for anyone that says there are no Gays in the military, the logs above for for a gay male dating site :)> TIA, maybe this is a non-topic, but it just strikes me as odd, that's all > and I'd like to find an/the answer for when my clients start asking.Nothing to worry about, they just have some government employees interested in their sites.> -Dan Dale ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ dale's stuff

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

autocommit problem (1998) date (1998) Resume Catalog ? (1997) Postdata expired from cache (2004) Bad File: DeleteCommand.html (1998) Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996) [LOOKUP] (1997) Processing all html files through WebCat or Typhoon (1998) Search returns all, not 20 (1997) Database Updates (1997) Re:Version 2.0 and 1.6 simultaneous (1997) WCf2 and nested tags (1997) Quick ShowIf question (1997) [WebDNA] Anyone using CODA ?? (2012) SQL (2004) Scoping rules in WebDNA 4.0 (2000) WAP (2000) Relevancy Rating (1998) [Cart] ... (1997) how do you and/or in a search? (1997)