Re: [OT] DOD

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 45020
interpreted = N
texte = Thanks, Dale.On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 19:44:01 dale's stuff wrote: >Dan, > > >On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 05:27 PM, Dan Strong wrote: > >>FunnelWeb Analyzer is showing from my logs that the US Department of >>Defense has been browsing my (and some of my clients') site(s). Is this >>accurate? A glitch in FunnelWeb? > > >Most likely it is accurate > >>I mean, if it's true, I suppose DOD employees like to surf the web too, >>but it just seems weird...maybe a new anti-cyberterrorist initiative? And >>if so, why me and my clients? Are any of you seeing this activity in your >>logs? > >Here is a snippet from my logs for April-May of this year (other months are similar, this is what >I had handy) > >US Government >Domain % pages hits K >gsa.gov 22.27% 1,779 28,777 46,551K >noaa.gov 21.48% 1,716 14,444 63,965K >uscourts.gov 10.59% 846 2,148 17,850K >faa.gov 7.73% 617 2,085 11,813K >fdic.gov 6.85% 547 1,401 12,221K >nih.gov 5.97% 477 3,008 18,792K >sannet.gov 5.73% 458 2,820 13,929K >neh.gov 3.83% 306 421 4,866K >va.gov 3.52% 281 4,053 9,593K >ca.gov 3.44% 275 1,611 6,200K >senate.gov 3.08% 246 1,037 5,119K >loc.gov 1.31% 105 489 2,558K >nasa.gov 1.10% 88 279 1,993K >blm.gov 0.63% 50 253 1,086K >treas.gov 0.53% 42 319 684K >sec.gov 0.46% 37 73 694K >usgs.gov 0.40% 32 285 938K >ssa.gov 0.30% 24 70 655K >sedgwick.gov 0.19% 15 39 298K >usps.gov 0.13% 10 84 224K >hud.gov 0.09% 7 50 152K >pppl.gov 0.09% 7 30 126K >ftc.gov 0.08% 6 39 204K >sandia.gov 0.04% 3 62 170K >maricopa.gov 0.04% 3 45 149K >peacecorps.gov 0.03% 2 40 83K >usda.gov 0.03% 2 23 50K >bnl.gov 0.03% 2 21 32K >usdoj.gov 0.01% 1 37 40K >frb.gov 0.01% 1 27 113K >jccbi.gov 0.01% 1 19 35K >doe.gov 0.01% 1 3 15K >epa.gov 0.00% 0 16 11K >opm.gov 0.00% 0 1 0K >usitc.gov 0.00% 0 0 0K >osha.gov 0.00% 0 0 1K > > >military >Domain % pages hits K >army.mil 43.25% 1,575 5,981 33,587K >navy.mil 41.35% 1,506 4,463 37,540K >nipr.mil 15.24% 555 3,348 14,203K >disa.mil 0.16% 6 101 195K >nima.mil 0.00% 0 1 0K >af.mil 0.00% 0 1 0K > > >I usually also see fbi.gov as well, it was kind of interesting that there weren't any during this >period. And for anyone that says there are no Gays in the military, the logs above for for a gay >male dating site :) > >>TIA, maybe this is a non-topic, but it just strikes me as odd, that's all >>and I'd like to find an/the answer for when my clients start asking. > >Nothing to worry about, they just have some government employees interested in their sites. > >>-Dan > > >Dale > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/------------------------------------------- http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [OT] DOD again *MYSTERY SOLVED* (Alex McCombie 2003)
  2. Re: [OT] DOD again *MYSTERY SOLVED* (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  3. Re: [OT] DOD again *MYSTERY SOLVED* (Dan Strong 2003)
  4. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  5. Re: [OT] DOD again (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  6. Re: [OT] DOD again (SREGALADO@aol.com 2003)
  7. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  8. Re: [OT] DOD again (Frank Nordberg 2003)
  9. Re: [OT] DOD again (Donovan 2003)
  10. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  11. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  12. Re: [OT] DOD again (Gyuri 2003)
  13. Re: [OT] DOD again (Donovan 2003)
  14. Re: [OT] DOD again (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  15. Re: [OT] DOD again (Alex McCombie 2003)
  16. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  17. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  18. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  19. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  20. Re: [OT] DOD again (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  21. Re: [OT] DOD again (Alex McCombie 2003)
  22. Re: [OT] DOD again (Brian Boegershausen 2003)
  23. Re: [OT] DOD again (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  24. Re: [OT] DOD again (Alex McCombie 2003)
  25. Re: [OT] DOD again (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  26. Re: [OT] DOD again (Brian Boegershausen 2003)
  27. [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  28. Re: [OT] DOD (Frank Nordberg 2002)
  29. Re: [OT] DOD (Dan Strong 2002)
  30. Re: [OT] DOD (dale's stuff 2002)
  31. Re: [OT] DOD (Dan Strong 2002)
  32. Re: [OT] DOD (Robert Wade 2002)
  33. Re: [OT] DOD (Gary Krockover 2002)
  34. [OT] DOD (Dan Strong 2002)
Thanks, Dale.On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 19:44:01 dale's stuff wrote: >Dan, > > >On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 05:27 PM, Dan Strong wrote: > >>FunnelWeb Analyzer is showing from my logs that the US Department of >>Defense has been browsing my (and some of my clients') site(s). Is this >>accurate? A glitch in FunnelWeb? > > >Most likely it is accurate > >>I mean, if it's true, I suppose DOD employees like to surf the web too, >>but it just seems weird...maybe a new anti-cyberterrorist initiative? And >>if so, why me and my clients? Are any of you seeing this activity in your >>logs? > >Here is a snippet from my logs for April-May of this year (other months are similar, this is what >I had handy) > >US Government >Domain % pages hits K >gsa.gov 22.27% 1,779 28,777 46,551K >noaa.gov 21.48% 1,716 14,444 63,965K >uscourts.gov 10.59% 846 2,148 17,850K >faa.gov 7.73% 617 2,085 11,813K >fdic.gov 6.85% 547 1,401 12,221K >nih.gov 5.97% 477 3,008 18,792K >sannet.gov 5.73% 458 2,820 13,929K >neh.gov 3.83% 306 421 4,866K >va.gov 3.52% 281 4,053 9,593K >ca.gov 3.44% 275 1,611 6,200K >senate.gov 3.08% 246 1,037 5,119K >loc.gov 1.31% 105 489 2,558K >nasa.gov 1.10% 88 279 1,993K >blm.gov 0.63% 50 253 1,086K >treas.gov 0.53% 42 319 684K >sec.gov 0.46% 37 73 694K >usgs.gov 0.40% 32 285 938K >ssa.gov 0.30% 24 70 655K >sedgwick.gov 0.19% 15 39 298K >usps.gov 0.13% 10 84 224K >hud.gov 0.09% 7 50 152K >pppl.gov 0.09% 7 30 126K >ftc.gov 0.08% 6 39 204K >sandia.gov 0.04% 3 62 170K >maricopa.gov 0.04% 3 45 149K >peacecorps.gov 0.03% 2 40 83K >usda.gov 0.03% 2 23 50K >bnl.gov 0.03% 2 21 32K >usdoj.gov 0.01% 1 37 40K >frb.gov 0.01% 1 27 113K >jccbi.gov 0.01% 1 19 35K >doe.gov 0.01% 1 3 15K >epa.gov 0.00% 0 16 11K >opm.gov 0.00% 0 1 0K >usitc.gov 0.00% 0 0 0K >osha.gov 0.00% 0 0 1K > > >military >Domain % pages hits K >army.mil 43.25% 1,575 5,981 33,587K >navy.mil 41.35% 1,506 4,463 37,540K >nipr.mil 15.24% 555 3,348 14,203K >disa.mil 0.16% 6 101 195K >nima.mil 0.00% 0 1 0K >af.mil 0.00% 0 1 0K > > >I usually also see fbi.gov as well, it was kind of interesting that there weren't any during this >period. And for anyone that says there are no Gays in the military, the logs above for for a gay >male dating site :) > >>TIA, maybe this is a non-topic, but it just strikes me as odd, that's all >>and I'd like to find an/the answer for when my clients start asking. > >Nothing to worry about, they just have some government employees interested in their sites. > >>-Dan > > >Dale > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/------------------------------------------- http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Dan Strong

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Candle Light Vigil (2001) Calculating Age from DB fields (2003) WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (1998) [WebDNA] WebDNA 7 (2011) [WriteFile] problems (1997) Email Set-Up? (1997) Trouble with [Math] (1998) [include ...] behavior (1997) [OT] (waaaay OT) (2004) Using the sendmail command on CGate Pro (Unix) (2000) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - More limits on [include] (1997) IE 6 weirdness ??? (2002) Date Formats (1997) NT or Mac (1997) WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997) [WebDNA] Ubuntu 14.04 & WebDNA (2017) customers order (1999) Can I use a [closedatabase] inside an [exclusivelock]? (2000) question: back button prevention (1997) [tcp connect] (1998)