Re: WebDNA Book?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 47529
interpreted = N
texte = Just a thought. One of the things I see is that people basically say its too much time/effort for the return. This may be true for an individual but what about a committee? I would think that if each of us tackled a particular part we could get a book done fairly quickly. Perhaps some of developers with more years in the battle field (such as Ken, John P, John H, Scott, Grant (if he's not so tired with his invention yet ;-) etc.. could be chief editors or such. ( Putting some of these names together might be opening a can of worms :-)?? But, I think there is ways that we could happily achieve the goal. Such as: Maybe these Chief Editors would be give a certain aspect of the book to Edit?. This way might limit the bickering. Some of the up and coming developers (such as myself) could actually write different parts. For example, I think I am skilled enough when it comes to the Formula's database to get it blocked out and then have someone look it over for editing or critique... When I get back my comments, I would then go back and correct things. Once I have a finnished piece of text, I would send my .pdf, bbedit file (or whatever) to someone in charge of putting it together. At that point, we could either find financing (for the actuall printing) or ?. WebDNA by the developersThe point is that we all have to make a living and by slicing up the responsibility, we accomplish a goal with minimal effort and we can still buy the latest Smith Micro copy of WebDNA.If it makes money, I guess we devide it up. (or throw a big party somewhere and hire some 80's hair band to play)Donovan -- -Donovan Brooke -Administrator of IT / -Assc. Art Director -Creative Services -Epsen Hillmer Graphics-402.342.1169 X297 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WebDNA Book? (Dan Strong 2003)
  2. Re: WebDNA Book? (Dan Strong 2003)
  3. Re: WebDNA Book? (Gary Krockover 2003)
  4. Re: WebDNA Book? (Charles Kline 2003)
  5. Re: WebDNA Book? (Donovan 2003)
  6. Re: WebDNA Book? (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  7. Re: WebDNA Book? (Clint Davis 2003)
  8. Re: WebDNA Book? (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  9. Re: WebDNA Book? (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  10. Re: WebDNA Book? (Alain Russell 2003)
  11. Re: WebDNA Book? (Stuart Tremain 2003)
  12. Re: WebDNA Book? (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  13. Re: WebDNA Book? (Marko Bernyk 2003)
  14. Re: WebDNA Book? (Dan Strong 2003)
  15. Re: WebDNA Book? (Charles Kline 2003)
  16. Re: WebDNA Book? (Dan Strong 2003)
  17. Re: WebDNA Book? (Charles Kline 2003)
  18. Re: WebDNA Book? (Dan Strong 2003)
  19. Re: WebDNA Book? (Brian B. Burton 2003)
  20. Re: WebDNA Book? (Brian Boegershausen 2003)
  21. Re: WebDNA Book? (Charles Kline 2003)
  22. Re: WebDNA Book? (Gary Krockover 2003)
  23. Re: WebDNA Book? (Dan Strong 2003)
  24. WebDNA Book? (Sales 2003)
Just a thought. One of the things I see is that people basically say its too much time/effort for the return. This may be true for an individual but what about a committee? I would think that if each of us tackled a particular part we could get a book done fairly quickly. Perhaps some of developers with more years in the battle field (such as Ken, John P, John H, Scott, Grant (if he's not so tired with his invention yet ;-) etc.. could be chief editors or such. ( Putting some of these names together might be opening a can of worms :-)?? But, I think there is ways that we could happily achieve the goal. Such as: Maybe these Chief Editors would be give a certain aspect of the book to Edit?. This way might limit the bickering. Some of the up and coming developers (such as myself) could actually write different parts. For example, I think I am skilled enough when it comes to the Formula's database to get it blocked out and then have someone look it over for editing or critique... When I get back my comments, I would then go back and correct things. Once I have a finnished piece of text, I would send my .pdf, bbedit file (or whatever) to someone in charge of putting it together. At that point, we could either find financing (for the actuall printing) or ?. WebDNA by the developersThe point is that we all have to make a living and by slicing up the responsibility, we accomplish a goal with minimal effort and we can still buy the latest Smith Micro copy of WebDNA.If it makes money, I guess we devide it up. (or throw a big party somewhere and hire some 80's hair band to play)Donovan -- -Donovan Brooke -Administrator of IT / -Assc. Art Director -Creative Services -Epsen Hillmer Graphics-402.342.1169 X297 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Donovan

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Re:Need help... (1997) Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997) Erotic Sites (1997) carrying values forward (1998) shipCost -vs- shippingtotal ? (2000) WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997) Re[2]: Field Problem (2000) NewCart+Search with one click ? (1997) WebCat2.0 acgi vs plugin (1997) MATH (1998) WebCat2b13 Command Reference Doc error (1997) [SHOWIF AND/OR] (1997) service stop and restart (1997) Tracking inbound links for discounts (1997) ARGH! (2004) Read and Write (2001) with Link i need to (1997) Shipcost lookup? (1997) Summing fields (1997) [ReturnRaw] and hiding FORM data (2003)