Re: What really killed WebDNA?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2007


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 69367
interpreted = N
texte = Funny, I had an IT person ask me yesterday why WebDNA didn't make it (after showing him 36 lines of asp.NET code vs. one line of WebDNA to do the same thing), and I said "bad marketing". I really wish SMSI would open source it too, or, failing that, sell it to someone who gives a shit. -Dan On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:42:03 -0500 "Will Starck" wrote: > Hello- > > So, I've finally come to terms with the fact that WebDNA died round about > 2004 give or take a few days. > > Aside from the fact that SMSI was always a terrible fit for this product (my > apologies SM, but it's true), I've often wondered-what exactly was it that > killed WebDNA (btw, I always hated that name)? > > I've always been curious about that question. > > Was there a technical reason (i.e. inability to integrate it to emerging web > development trends, lack of new potential features that would justify > further upgrade cycles) or did SM just lose interest, or is/are there some > other reason(s)? > > I'd be interested in your theories - is there any reason to push for an open > source version, or should this dead horse stay dead because it is > irrelevant? > > Your long suffering friend, > > Will Starck > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Toby Cox 2007)
  2. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Larry Hewitt 2007)
  3. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Jesse Proudman 2007)
  4. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
  5. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Clint Davis 2007)
  6. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Matthew Bohne 2007)
  7. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Gary Krockover" 2007)
  8. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Paul Willis 2007)
  9. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Dan Strong" 2007)
  10. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Dean Smith 2007)
  11. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Frank Nordberg 2007)
  12. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Will Starck" 2007)
  13. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Charles Kline 2007)
  14. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Frank Nordberg 2007)
  15. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
  16. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Stuart Tremain 2007)
  17. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Chris Moore" 2007)
  18. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Dan Strong" 2007)
  19. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Gary Krockover 2007)
  20. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Claude Gelinas 2007)
  21. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Stuart Tremain 2007)
  22. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Vincent Medina" 2007)
  23. What really killed WebDNA? ( "Will Starck" 2007)
Funny, I had an IT person ask me yesterday why WebDNA didn't make it (after showing him 36 lines of asp.NET code vs. one line of WebDNA to do the same thing), and I said "bad marketing". I really wish SMSI would open source it too, or, failing that, sell it to someone who gives a shit. -Dan On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:42:03 -0500 "Will Starck" wrote: > Hello- > > So, I've finally come to terms with the fact that WebDNA died round about > 2004 give or take a few days. > > Aside from the fact that SMSI was always a terrible fit for this product (my > apologies SM, but it's true), I've often wondered-what exactly was it that > killed WebDNA (btw, I always hated that name)? > > I've always been curious about that question. > > Was there a technical reason (i.e. inability to integrate it to emerging web > development trends, lack of new potential features that would justify > further upgrade cycles) or did SM just lose interest, or is/are there some > other reason(s)? > > I'd be interested in your theories - is there any reason to push for an open > source version, or should this dead horse stay dead because it is > irrelevant? > > Your long suffering friend, > > Will Starck > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ "Dan Strong"

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Emailer help....! (1997) OT: JavaScript question (2001) psst (1997) Convert words (2002) Re:Emailer tracking (1997) remotely add + sign (1997) Custom WebCat Prefs ... (1997) Server crash (1997) Visitor info (2000) [WebDNA] Triggers.db wiped completely blank (2011) Another question (1997) Rhapsody? (1997) Multiple catalog databases and showcart (1997) [WebDNA] SEARCH question (2011) Problem with 2.1b3 (1997) New Web Site Developers Database (1996) Parsing args without ? (2003) Internet Explorer and caching (2000) allow or deny based on referer.... (1997) Problems with sql: "not supported" (2005)