Re: What really killed WebDNA?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2007
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 69368
interpreted = N
texte = Hi,I've been wondering the same thing for a long time, as I am converting asite from WebDNA to PHP and upgrading the site. Seeing that SM isn'tupdating their software, I personally think that WebDNA would have beengreat if it was kept up to date or as Dan says sell it to someone who doesgive a shit or open source it.Chris.-----Original Message-----From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] On Behalf Of DanStrongSent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:11 PMTo: WebDNA TalkSubject: Re: What really killed WebDNA?Funny, I had an IT person ask me yesterday why WebDNA didn't make it (aftershowing him 36 lines of asp.NET code vs. one line of WebDNA to do the same thing), and I said"bad marketing". I really wish SMSI would open source it too, or, failing that, sell it to someone whogives a shit.-DanOn Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:42:03 -0500 "Will Starck"
wrote:> Hello-> > So, I've finally come to terms with the fact that WebDNA died round about> 2004 give or take a few days.> > Aside from the fact that SMSI was always a terrible fit for this product(my> apologies SM, but it's true), I've often wondered-what exactly was it that> killed WebDNA (btw, I always hated that name)? > > I've always been curious about that question.> > Was there a technical reason (i.e. inability to integrate it to emergingweb> development trends, lack of new potential features that would justify> further upgrade cycles) or did SM just lose interest, or is/are there some> other reason(s)?> > I'd be interested in your theories - is there any reason to push for anopen> source version, or should this dead horse stay dead because it is> irrelevant?> > Your long suffering friend,> > Will Starck> > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail toWeb Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Hi,I've been wondering the same thing for a long time, as I am converting asite from WebDNA to PHP and upgrading the site. Seeing that SM isn'tupdating their software, I personally think that WebDNA would have beengreat if it was kept up to date or as Dan says sell it to someone who doesgive a shit or open source it.Chris.-----Original Message-----From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] On Behalf Of DanStrongSent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:11 PMTo: WebDNA TalkSubject: Re: What really killed WebDNA?Funny, I had an IT person ask me yesterday why WebDNA didn't make it (aftershowing him 36 lines of asp.NET code vs. one line of WebDNA to do the same thing), and I said"bad marketing". I really wish SMSI would open source it too, or, failing that, sell it to someone whogives a shit.-DanOn Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:42:03 -0500 "Will Starck" wrote:> Hello-> > So, I've finally come to terms with the fact that WebDNA died round about> 2004 give or take a few days.> > Aside from the fact that SMSI was always a terrible fit for this product(my> apologies SM, but it's true), I've often wondered-what exactly was it that> killed WebDNA (btw, I always hated that name)? > > I've always been curious about that question.> > Was there a technical reason (i.e. inability to integrate it to emergingweb> development trends, lack of new potential features that would justify> further upgrade cycles) or did SM just lose interest, or is/are there some> other reason(s)?> > I'd be interested in your theories - is there any reason to push for anopen> source version, or should this dead horse stay dead because it is> irrelevant?> > Your long suffering friend,> > Will Starck> > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail toWeb Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
"Chris Moore"
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
multiple databases (1997)
Nested search (1997)
Mac -Shareware Listserver (1998)
Changing to a windows mounted share from a Mac OS X machine (2002)
emailer (1997)
WebCat2b14MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't hide the search string (1997)
NT BETA BUG???? (1997)
Shell and telnet (2002)
Problems getting parameters passed into email. (1997)
Another form question (2000)
PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997)
AutoCommit Preference? (1998)
eMail volume (2000)
searchable list archive (1997)
[protect admin] (1997)
inventory management (2000)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997)
emailer and bad addresses (1997)
Forcing a NEWCART (1997)
carriage returns in data (1997)