Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103961
interpreted = N
texte = Brian Fries wrote: > Overall quite good. A few nitpicks... ... >> WebCatalog and Pacific Coast Software was purchased > > > "was" should be "were" There's no real need to include WebCatalog in that sentence at all. It goes without saying that when Smith Micro purchased the Pacific they also gained the rights to the software. --- Stuart Tremain wrote: > I think it important to state that it can be used on Mac, Windows & > Linux servers. Yes, that's very important. The way the article is right now, one can easily get the impression WebDNA is still a Mac-only application. Perhaps it should even be included in the very first paragraph. --- A couple of comments to this paragraph: From 2005 to 2008, for perhaps various reasons including the success of Smith Micro Software with other products, WebDNA users began to lose support from the owners and the language went into decline. WebDNA lost many of its users who then opted for more actively supported solutions. The fate of WebDNA was unknown during these years and it was ultimately the developers of WebDNA who revived the language. "for perhaps various reasons" - should read "perhaps for various reasons" But I think it's better to leave the phrase out completely. It has no semantic content and the underlying meaning (which the readers may or may not catch) goes something like: "SmithMicro lost the plot but it wouldn't be polite to say that so we added a meaningless phrase here instead." "WebDNA users began to lose support from the owners" is a bit clumsy language but I'm not quite sure how to rephrase it. "WebDNA lost many of its users who then opted for more actively supported solutions" I think this i better language: "WebDNA lost many of its users to more actively supported solutions" "The fate of WebDNA was unknown" -> "The fate of WebDNA was uncertain" Frank Nordberg http://www.musicaviva.com http://stores.ebay.com/Nordbergs-Music-Store?refid=store Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Patrick McCormick 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Christer Olsson 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Frank Nordberg 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Grant Hulbert 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Stuart Tremain 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Christer Olsson 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Dan Strong 2009)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Grant Hulbert 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Tana Adams 2009)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Brian Fries 2009)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  28. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  29. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  30. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  31. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Toby Cox 2009)
  32. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Matthew Bohne 2009)
  33. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Dan Strong 2009)
  34. [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
Brian Fries wrote: > Overall quite good. A few nitpicks... ... >> WebCatalog and Pacific Coast Software was purchased > > > "was" should be "were" There's no real need to include WebCatalog in that sentence at all. It goes without saying that when Smith Micro purchased the Pacific they also gained the rights to the software. --- Stuart Tremain wrote: > I think it important to state that it can be used on Mac, Windows & > Linux servers. Yes, that's very important. The way the article is right now, one can easily get the impression WebDNA is still a Mac-only application. Perhaps it should even be included in the very first paragraph. --- A couple of comments to this paragraph: From 2005 to 2008, for perhaps various reasons including the success of Smith Micro Software with other products, WebDNA users began to lose support from the owners and the language went into decline. WebDNA lost many of its users who then opted for more actively supported solutions. The fate of WebDNA was unknown during these years and it was ultimately the developers of WebDNA who revived the language. "for perhaps various reasons" - should read "perhaps for various reasons" But I think it's better to leave the phrase out completely. It has no semantic content and the underlying meaning (which the readers may or may not catch) goes something like: "SmithMicro lost the plot but it wouldn't be polite to say that so we added a meaningless phrase here instead." "WebDNA users began to lose support from the owners" is a bit clumsy language but I'm not quite sure how to rephrase it. "WebDNA lost many of its users who then opted for more actively supported solutions" I think this i better language: "WebDNA lost many of its users to more actively supported solutions" "The fate of WebDNA was unknown" -> "The fate of WebDNA was uncertain" Frank Nordberg http://www.musicaviva.com http://stores.ebay.com/Nordbergs-Music-Store?refid=store Frank Nordberg

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

multiple search commands (1997) Hiding HTML and page breaks (1997) Max Record length restated as maybe bug (1997) A question on sub-categories (1997) [OT] Password protecting a folder in iTools (2003) WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997) WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997) Dark Horse Comics success story (1997) problems with 2 tags (1997) Bug or syntax error on my part? (1997) emailer (1997) form data submission gets truncated (1997) Re[2]: Adding Text (2000) Search returns all, not 20 (1997) WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997) Requiring that certain fields be completed (1997) 6.0 /Panther install issues (2004) A multi-processor savvy WebCatalog? (1997) process SSI (1998) $flushcache causes crash (2000)