Re: WebDNA performance comparisons?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2004
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 58896
interpreted = N
texte = Don't get me started on Marketing and SMSI :-( They have one of the best Scripting languages on this planet and their marketing is not using it properly. At least, try to explain a European what WebDNA is...... Anyhow, on to business. :-) Nitai -- Redakto - Content Management that simply works Content Management & eBusiness Systems ComputerOilR AG Dammstrasse 7 5400 Baden / Switzerland Telefon +41 (0)844 44 55 66 info@computeroil.com http://computeroil.com -----Original Message----- From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] On Behalf Of Patrick McCormick Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 5:37 PM To: WebDNA Talk Subject: Re: WebDNA performance comparisons? Most people think that a RAM disk is the same thing as WebDNA's RAM database. I'd like to find some way to show that if the database part is coded to read and write from a disk - even a RAM disk - it is significantly slower than WebDNA's RAM optimized database. It feels like SmithMicro doesn't understand the significance of this and won't jump in with both feet to properly market it. They won't promote the dragster because they're afraid to drive that fast. On Jul 27, 2004, at 9:45 AM, ComputerOil - Nitai wrote: > WebDNA for sure is faster then ColdFusion, according to our internal > development. But I guess that depends on the DB, because WebDNA stores > it in > RAM. There has been some talk on this list about performance and > someone > (sorry forgot the name) made some templates to test. > > Nitai > > -- > Redakto - Content Management that simply works > Content Management & eBusiness Systems > > ComputerOilR AG > Dammstrasse 7 > 5400 Baden / Switzerland > Telefon +41 (0)844 44 55 66 > > info@computeroil.com > http://computeroil.com > -----Original Message----- > From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] On Behalf Of > Patrick McCormick > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 3:52 PM > To: WebDNA Talk > Subject: WebDNA performance comparisons? > > Has anyone created any sample sites to compare the performance of > WebDNA to alternatives like ASP/SQL, PHP, ColdFusion, etc.? > > I'm looking for specific comparisons for speed and capacity, etc > > Thanks, > Pat > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list
. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Don't get me started on Marketing and SMSI :-( They have one of the best Scripting languages on this planet and their marketing is not using it properly. At least, try to explain a European what WebDNA is...... Anyhow, on to business. :-) Nitai -- Redakto - Content Management that simply works Content Management & eBusiness Systems ComputerOilR AG Dammstrasse 7 5400 Baden / Switzerland Telefon +41 (0)844 44 55 66 info@computeroil.com http://computeroil.com -----Original Message----- From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] On Behalf Of Patrick McCormick Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 5:37 PM To: WebDNA Talk Subject: Re: WebDNA performance comparisons? Most people think that a RAM disk is the same thing as WebDNA's RAM database. I'd like to find some way to show that if the database part is coded to read and write from a disk - even a RAM disk - it is significantly slower than WebDNA's RAM optimized database. It feels like SmithMicro doesn't understand the significance of this and won't jump in with both feet to properly market it. They won't promote the dragster because they're afraid to drive that fast. On Jul 27, 2004, at 9:45 AM, ComputerOil - Nitai wrote: > WebDNA for sure is faster then ColdFusion, according to our internal > development. But I guess that depends on the DB, because WebDNA stores > it in > RAM. There has been some talk on this list about performance and > someone > (sorry forgot the name) made some templates to test. > > Nitai > > -- > Redakto - Content Management that simply works > Content Management & eBusiness Systems > > ComputerOilR AG > Dammstrasse 7 > 5400 Baden / Switzerland > Telefon +41 (0)844 44 55 66 > > info@computeroil.com > http://computeroil.com > -----Original Message----- > From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] On Behalf Of > Patrick McCormick > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 3:52 PM > To: WebDNA Talk > Subject: WebDNA performance comparisons? > > Has anyone created any sample sites to compare the performance of > WebDNA to alternatives like ASP/SQL, PHP, ColdFusion, etc.? > > I'm looking for specific comparisons for speed and capacity, etc > > Thanks, > Pat > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
"ComputerOil - Nitai"
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Configuring E-mail (1997)
Search for 20 finds ... Eureka! (1997)
A good idea? (1998)
Links and urls (2005)
Question About XML Style Syntax (2000)
possible, WebCat2.0 and checkboxes-restated (1997)
For Sale: WebTen 2.x and WebCat 2.x (2000)
Can't load tmpl files (1997)
Searching an Email database (1997)
Setting up shop (1997)
Resume Catalog ? (1997)
[WebDNA] How to stop cutting a word (2008)
TRAINING videos - Prove IT. (1998)
searching illegal HTML (2002)
Kanji in http requests (1998)
bcc and sendmail (2001)
WebCat for mass emailings (1997)
Re:no [search] with NT (1997)
[WriteFile] problems (1997)
Re:Help name our technology! (1997)