Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2010
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104449
interpreted = N
texte = On Jan 13, 2010, at 13:22, Kenneth Grome wrote: > I actually wrote such a db-driven eCommerce system for Typhoon 10-15 = years ago. It was exceptionally flexible compared with the old cart = file system. But Typhoon died so I never bothered doing anything with = it. I wonder if I still have it on my hard drive somewhere? I'll have = to check. would be interesting if you find it and are willing to share... > In other words you're going to continue to maintain 6.2.1 basically as = 6.2 exists now (only with some bug fixes?) so people can still use = WebDNA the same way they have always used it. Yet for those with = simpler needs and an eye toward the future, your new standard product is = going to be the FastCGI version. Is this correct or have I = misunderstood something here? The fastCGI will not be the "poor man's choice", on the contrary: it = should be faster, more robust, should run under varied configurations, = platforms and webservers. Nginx has fastCGI support, so it should also = run with nginx too. If you take Ruby on Rails, it is only available as a fastCGI, and Lasso = is also doing the move to fastCGI. WebDNA fastCGI version with new licensing system is already running. = What we are working on at this time is the XSL / XSLT features and this = part needs a lot of work. The Windows version will follow, with a lot of = work there too. - chris
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
On Jan 13, 2010, at 13:22, Kenneth Grome wrote: > I actually wrote such a db-driven eCommerce system for Typhoon 10-15 = years ago. It was exceptionally flexible compared with the old cart = file system. But Typhoon died so I never bothered doing anything with = it. I wonder if I still have it on my hard drive somewhere? I'll have = to check. would be interesting if you find it and are willing to share... > In other words you're going to continue to maintain 6.2.1 basically as = 6.2 exists now (only with some bug fixes?) so people can still use = WebDNA the same way they have always used it. Yet for those with = simpler needs and an eye toward the future, your new standard product is = going to be the FastCGI version. Is this correct or have I = misunderstood something here? The fastCGI will not be the "poor man's choice", on the contrary: it = should be faster, more robust, should run under varied configurations, = platforms and webservers. Nginx has fastCGI support, so it should also = run with nginx too. If you take Ruby on Rails, it is only available as a fastCGI, and Lasso = is also doing the move to fastCGI. WebDNA fastCGI version with new licensing system is already running. = What we are working on at this time is the XSL / XSLT features and this = part needs a lot of work. The Windows version will follow, with a lot of = work there too. - chris
christophe.billiottet@webdna.us
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
What am I missing (1997)
Storing Data (2002)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - [protect] (1997)
WebCat2b12 CGI Mac - [shownext] problem (1997)
WebDNA update from Smith Micro (2002)
Web Developer Product Awards (1997)
Before I Can Begin . . . (1998)
Replacing entry (1998)
Unexpected comparison behavior change in 4.5.1 (2003)
[include] (1998)
[REFERRER] bug? (1998)
Associative lookup style? (1997)
webcat nt (1997)
template includes encrypted template (1999)
Mac -Shareware Listserver (1998)
math on date? (1997)
Writefile problem (1999)
WebCat2.0 [format thousands .0f] no go (1997)
Multiple security dbs (1997)
Problem (1997)