Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2010


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104492
interpreted = N
texte = > When you look at php, one of the biggest things that php has > going for it is an army of people willing to work for free. Hard > to compete against that, you know? Agreed. I think this is why so many of us were pushing for open source WebDNA -- because we know that lots of programmers will flock to WebDNA once they get a taste of it -- and offer free programming labor. It's not like open course programmers invest their time and then have to pay for the software on top of that. Know what I mean? > If you think the docs are crappy, then why not offer to help > update them? Maybe we could have a wiki and police each > other? You get the idea. I get the idea, and I have offered to help absolutely free of charge -- not on the docs but in other ways, one of which was substantial and potentially very valuable to WSC just last year. Unfortunately they refused to support my efforts so I got discouraged and decided not to bother any more. Has something about WSC's policies changed since then? Sincerely, Kenneth Grome www.KenGrome.com Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Jym Duane 2010)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Bob Minor 2010)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Govinda 2010)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Dan Strong 2010)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Bob Minor 2010)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Dan Strong 2010)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Brian Fries 2010)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Govinda 2010)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future ("Terry Wilson" 2010)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future ("JD Ready" 12:4)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future ("Terry Wilson" 2010)
  28. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  29. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  30. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Brian Fries 2010)
  31. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  32. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  33. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  34. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  35. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  36. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  37. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Rob 2010)
  38. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  39. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  40. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Bob Minor 2010)
  41. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  42. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  43. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  44. [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
> When you look at php, one of the biggest things that php has > going for it is an army of people willing to work for free. Hard > to compete against that, you know? Agreed. I think this is why so many of us were pushing for open source WebDNA -- because we know that lots of programmers will flock to WebDNA once they get a taste of it -- and offer free programming labor. It's not like open course programmers invest their time and then have to pay for the software on top of that. Know what I mean? > If you think the docs are crappy, then why not offer to help > update them? Maybe we could have a wiki and police each > other? You get the idea. I get the idea, and I have offered to help absolutely free of charge -- not on the docs but in other ways, one of which was substantial and potentially very valuable to WSC just last year. Unfortunately they refused to support my efforts so I got discouraged and decided not to bother any more. Has something about WSC's policies changed since then? Sincerely, Kenneth Grome www.KenGrome.com Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

HTML Editors (1997) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997) Apache suffix mapping for .tpl (2000) two forms of delivery (1998) Adding to Cart (2004) Email (1998) WebCat2final1 crashes (1997) Nested [tags] (2001) E-mailer error codes (1997) Plugin or CGI or both (1997) Hiding HTML and page breaks (1997) checking for [ and ] in form fields ... (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) HELP WITH DATES (1997) What is the syntax for MIME type on Apache server? (2000) displaying New products (using [date]) (1997) [WriteFile] problems (1997) mass mailing (1998) Tax Collection for Different Items (2003) WC 2.0 frames feature (1997)