Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2013
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 110911
interpreted = N
texte = I vote single binary as well. Looks like there is some interest. =20 Licensing would have to still phone home I guess to verify serial number = as I think Web Catalog did. It=92s not that these machines don=92t have internet access, it=92s that = some clients don=92t want their data in the cloud, and telling them I = have to install a web server on a stand along PC, or their network = server, and then I have to deal with their network manager, it just gets = into too many issues for them, they don=92t understand, and they and = don=92t want to buy what they don=92t understand. If I say, well I just = have to install one app, it=92s easy to sell. Hey, it=92s just like = installing Office. That they understand. Ideally I would be able to install on the office file server as well. = Maybe you could sell licenses by number of users? These are small clients for me, probably the WebDNA developers with = large clients would not use this, so I think it opens up a market for = smaller businesses. If a particular application needs PHP I guess that = is a reason to say you need to have a Cloud based solution. But there = are so many things that can be done just with WebDNA alone it would = certainly open up my markets. Thanks for considering. Frank On Nov 28, 2013, at 8:29 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > Hi Frank! how would you see that? a kind of =93WebDNA + built-in web = server=94 in one single binary? or a pre-built WebDNA + webserver = installation? >=20 >=20 > - chris >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Nov 28, 2013, at 5:02 PM, C. Frank Wolfe
wrote: >=20 >> Since I don=92t seem to be the only one up at this hour (4 am in = Hawaii), does anyone else think it would be a GREAT idea to have a = runtime version or WebDNA, or an App that you could run on a single = computer? I have clients that I could do so much with, but they won=92t = put data on the internet even with a secure server. >>=20 >> I supposed it would have to have a little web server built in, but it = would be so much easier than convincing some of these companies to = install ISS or whatever on their network or adding a box just for = WebDNA. A network version would be even better, and I would pay for = those each and every time and bill the client. One price for a single = computer, more for the network version. >>=20 >> Christophe/Donovan? >>=20 >> Hopefully, >>=20 >> Frank >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- This = message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . = To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: = http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: = support@webdna.us >=20
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I vote single binary as well. Looks like there is some interest. =20 Licensing would have to still phone home I guess to verify serial number = as I think Web Catalog did. It=92s not that these machines don=92t have internet access, it=92s that = some clients don=92t want their data in the cloud, and telling them I = have to install a web server on a stand along PC, or their network = server, and then I have to deal with their network manager, it just gets = into too many issues for them, they don=92t understand, and they and = don=92t want to buy what they don=92t understand. If I say, well I just = have to install one app, it=92s easy to sell. Hey, it=92s just like = installing Office. That they understand. Ideally I would be able to install on the office file server as well. = Maybe you could sell licenses by number of users? These are small clients for me, probably the WebDNA developers with = large clients would not use this, so I think it opens up a market for = smaller businesses. If a particular application needs PHP I guess that = is a reason to say you need to have a Cloud based solution. But there = are so many things that can be done just with WebDNA alone it would = certainly open up my markets. Thanks for considering. Frank On Nov 28, 2013, at 8:29 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > Hi Frank! how would you see that? a kind of =93WebDNA + built-in web = server=94 in one single binary? or a pre-built WebDNA + webserver = installation? >=20 >=20 > - chris >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Nov 28, 2013, at 5:02 PM, C. Frank Wolfe wrote: >=20 >> Since I don=92t seem to be the only one up at this hour (4 am in = Hawaii), does anyone else think it would be a GREAT idea to have a = runtime version or WebDNA, or an App that you could run on a single = computer? I have clients that I could do so much with, but they won=92t = put data on the internet even with a secure server. >>=20 >> I supposed it would have to have a little web server built in, but it = would be so much easier than convincing some of these companies to = install ISS or whatever on their network or adding a box just for = WebDNA. A network version would be even better, and I would pay for = those each and every time and bill the client. One price for a single = computer, more for the network version. >>=20 >> Christophe/Donovan? >>=20 >> Hopefully, >>=20 >> Frank >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- This = message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . = To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: = http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: = support@webdna.us >=20
frank@cwolfe.com
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Date format problems (1997)
WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997)
Protect (1997)
lookup and two records? (1997)
Shared databases (2003)
authenticate (2002)
Echo? (2003)
Nested vs conditional (1997)
Press Release hit the NewsWire!!! (1997)
Altavista has got virus infection! (1998)
Jimmy Houssen (1998)
read and write you own cookies with webcat (1997)
FORMS: Returning a specific page (1997)
Replace Statement (1997)
Log-in Scheme (2003)
WC2b15 File Corruption (1997)
[TEST] - Please Ignore (2000)
Re[2]: Problems with WebCat (2000)
Looking for Salvatore (2003)
Database changes (1998)