Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 48151
interpreted = N
texte = Me Too!Phillip, I agree with Donovan on this as I am sure many others will as well.While I can eek out another $50 from a customer for a new site (I don't wantto, but you guys are making up these stupid rules), I would find it hard topony up money every time I create a subdomain for my own sites.Sure, some are going to say the value of the features outweighs the costs.But for me, as it currently is proposed/set, it is not worth it.PaulOn 2/27/03 10:47 AM, Donovan wrote:> Phillip Bonesteele wrote:> [snip]> > Philip,> Here is the thing I'm most frustrated with. The non-distinction between> hosts (sub-domains) and domains. I understand that SM is trying to offer> a cheaper entry point. I think this is a good idea. However, please> consider the> following; please allow a single license to include sub-domains.> > Hosts (sub-domains) have always been a feature that one has complete> ownership over once> they buy a domain. It is frustrating to know that if one owns:> surfing.com that> one will have to pay extra for creating:> > www.surfing.com> dev.surfing.com> secure.surfing.com> > I might be sold on a per domain system but I will not on a per> sub-domain system.> Please reconsider adding allowing hosts.> > Sincerely,> Donovan> > -------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Clint Davis 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Jim Lanford 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Paul Willis 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (WJ Starck 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Clement Ross 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Kimberly D. Walls 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (John Peacock 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Paul Uttermohlen 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Alex McCombie 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Brian Fries 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Bob Minor 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Phillip Bonesteele 2003) Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (WJ Starck 2003) Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)

Me Too!Phillip, I agree with Donovan on this as I am sure many others will as well.While I can eek out another $50 from a customer for a new site (I don't wantto, but you guys are making up these stupid rules), I would find it hard topony up money every time I create a subdomain for my own sites.Sure, some are going to say the value of the features outweighs the costs.But for me, as it currently is proposed/set, it is not worth it.PaulOn 2/27/03 10:47 AM, Donovan wrote:> Phillip Bonesteele wrote:> [snip]> > Philip,> Here is the thing I'm most frustrated with. The non-distinction between> hosts (sub-domains) and domains. I understand that SM is trying to offer> a cheaper entry point. I think this is a good idea. However, please> consider the> following; please allow a single license to include sub-domains.> > Hosts (sub-domains) have always been a feature that one has complete> ownership over once> they buy a domain. It is frustrating to know that if one owns:> surfing.com that> one will have to pay extra for creating:> > www.surfing.com> dev.surfing.com> secure.surfing.com> > I might be sold on a per domain system but I will not on a per> sub-domain system.> Please reconsider adding allowing hosts.> > Sincerely,> Donovan> > -------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Paul Uttermohlen

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Re:E-Mailer (WebCatb15acgiMac) (1997) [WebDNA] Dreamweaver Tag Libraries and Snippets (2011) Add more fields to an existent data base (1997) Dumb Question about Docs (1997) WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997) catching WebDNA error messages (2003) ErrorMessages.db suggestion (1997) Can't load tmpl files (1997) CommandSecurity? (1997) help needed: Non-english characters in WebCatalog (1997) WebCat for Unix?? (1997) switching users (1998) [WriteFile] problems (1997) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) [LOOKUP] (1997) Passing values - never mind (1999) [ShowNext] feature in 2.0 (1997) Max Record length (1997) Location of Webcat site in folder hierarchy (1997) Reversed words (1997)