Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 48178
interpreted = N
texte = Donovan wrote: > www.surfing.com > dev.surfing.com > secure.surfing.com > > I might be sold on a per domain system but I will not on a per > sub-domain system.I can see both sides of this equation, since clearly SMSI doesn't want site1.domain.com site2.domain.com site3.domain.com site4.domain.com site5.domain.com site6.domain.com site7.domain.com ... site10000.domain.comto all be a single license. Yet many people use two host names for the www and secure variants of their sites; this is not essential for proper operation of an e-commerce web site, but it is a convenience.How about this for a compromise: a site for licensing purposes encompasses two host names, e.g. www and secure (or whatever you want them to be), which must be keyed in when entering the license. This way, the logical site corresponds to the license, but SMSI doesn't get abused by schemes like the above. Donovan's dev.surfing.com gets covered under the FREE dev license, so it is not an issue.John-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Clint Davis 2003)
  2. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Jim Lanford 2003)
  3. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Paul Willis 2003)
  4. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (WJ Starck 2003)
  5. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Clement Ross 2003)
  6. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  7. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  8. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (John Peacock 2003)
  9. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  10. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  11. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Paul Uttermohlen 2003)
  12. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  13. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Alex McCombie 2003)
  14. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  15. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  16. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Brian Fries 2003)
  17. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Bob Minor 2003)
  18. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003)
  19. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  20. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (WJ Starck 2003)
  21. Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
Donovan wrote: > www.surfing.com > dev.surfing.com > secure.surfing.com > > I might be sold on a per domain system but I will not on a per > sub-domain system.I can see both sides of this equation, since clearly SMSI doesn't want site1.domain.com site2.domain.com site3.domain.com site4.domain.com site5.domain.com site6.domain.com site7.domain.com ... site10000.domain.comto all be a single license. Yet many people use two host names for the www and secure variants of their sites; this is not essential for proper operation of an e-commerce web site, but it is a convenience.How about this for a compromise: a site for licensing purposes encompasses two host names, e.g. www and secure (or whatever you want them to be), which must be keyed in when entering the license. This way, the logical site corresponds to the license, but SMSI doesn't get abused by schemes like the above. Donovan's dev.surfing.com gets covered under the FREE dev license, so it is not an issue.John-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ John Peacock

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[WebDNA] IIS 6.0 Custom Errors & WebDNA 6.2 (2009) maximu values for sendmail! (1997) Webcatalog and IIS4b2 (1997) multiple prices (1998) RAM variables (1997) Simple Database close connection (2001) Electronic Delivery (1997) searching multiple databases in single search (1997) Help with Repost Data msg from form (1997) Maybe off topic but how to charge (1997) Search and Show Question (2003) Re2: AAgghh!! Help, please. SSL strikes again. (1997) WebCatalog 2.0 b 15 mac (1997) PhotoMill -> PhotoMaster (1997) Major Security Hole IIS NT (1998) How did *you* learn Web Catalog? (2000) [WebDNA] ImageMagick code (2013) [/application] error? (1997) Emailer Problem (1999) Email (2000)