Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 48200
interpreted = N
texte = Yup, per sub-domain does not make sense.For each and every client we usually have:domain.comwww.domain.comsecure.domain.comand sometimes store.domain.comAll pointing to the save directory. It should be like when we register the domain name, the client pays once fordomain.com but does not pay anything for www.domain.com.If you do it this way, you will obviously have some people that will abusethe license by doing something like that: client1.isp.com,store.client.isp.com. So they wont have to pay any additional 50$ but ithink this would be a very small minority.Clem.Donovan wrote:> > Phillip Bonesteele wrote:> [snip]> > Philip,> Here is the thing I'm most frustrated with. The non-distinction between> hosts (sub-domains) and domains. I understand that SM is trying to offer> a cheaper entry point. I think this is a good idea. However, please> consider the> following; please allow a single license to include sub-domains.> > Hosts (sub-domains) have always been a feature that one has complete> ownership over once> they buy a domain. It is frustrating to know that if one owns:> surfing.com that> one will have to pay extra for creating:> > www.surfing.com> dev.surfing.com> secure.surfing.com> > I might be sold on a per domain system but I will not on a per> sub-domain system.> Please reconsider adding allowing hosts.> > Sincerely,> Donovan> > --> -Donovan Brooke> -Administrator of IT /> -Assc. Art Director> -Creative Services> -Epsen Hillmer Graphics> > -402.342.1169 X297>-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Clint Davis 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Jim Lanford 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Paul Willis 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (WJ Starck 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Clement Ross 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (John Peacock 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Paul Uttermohlen 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Alex McCombie 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Brian Fries 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Bob Minor 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (WJ Starck 2003)
Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)

Yup, per sub-domain does not make sense.For each and every client we usually have:domain.comwww.domain.comsecure.domain.comand sometimes store.domain.comAll pointing to the save directory. It should be like when we register the domain name, the client pays once fordomain.com but does not pay anything for www.domain.com.If you do it this way, you will obviously have some people that will abusethe license by doing something like that: client1.isp.com,store.client.isp.com. So they wont have to pay any additional 50$ but ithink this would be a very small minority.Clem.Donovan wrote:> > Phillip Bonesteele wrote:> [snip]> > Philip,> Here is the thing I'm most frustrated with. The non-distinction between> hosts (sub-domains) and domains. I understand that SM is trying to offer> a cheaper entry point. I think this is a good idea. However, please> consider the> following; please allow a single license to include sub-domains.> > Hosts (sub-domains) have always been a feature that one has complete> ownership over once> they buy a domain. It is frustrating to know that if one owns:> surfing.com that> one will have to pay extra for creating:> > www.surfing.com> dev.surfing.com> secure.surfing.com> > I might be sold on a per domain system but I will not on a per> sub-domain system.> Please reconsider adding allowing hosts.> > Sincerely,> Donovan> > --> -Donovan Brooke> -Administrator of IT /> -Assc. Art Director> -Creative Services> -Epsen Hillmer Graphics> > -402.342.1169 X297>-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Clement Ross

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating

2003

Top Articles:

Related Readings: