Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 48205
interpreted = N
texte = On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 05:25 PM, Kimberly D. Walls wrote:> Let me get this straight... > (I'm sorry, but it's really, really, really hard for me to imagine > this to > be true.) > > I buy outlandexpeditions.com > I buy ocoeeriver.net > I build a site for www.outlandexpeditions.com > I want www.ocoeeriver.net to point to that site. > > It costs me $50 plus the time and effort of serial numbers, etc... to > do > nothing more than use a [redirect]?? Some will say to have Apache do the redirect and save the $50 It is it is so easy to have WebCat do it. (dynamic redirects are so easy and useful with WebDNA)But, I would like a better solution to this mess. I have a lot of little web sites that live on my e-commerce server that use just a little WebDNA (simple tracking, includes and a few redirects)Looks like I'm not upgrading till I figure out what is really going to cost, > Then it costs me another $50 + $50 so that the two domains continue to > work > when the visitor doesn't type in www.?? > > I'm sorry if I'm being redundant here, but I'm seriously having a hard > time > thinking that it costs me $150.00 to make this happen, when the 2 > domains > together only cost me $30 and about 3 minutes worth of time to > configure my > server. > > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Clint Davis 2003)
  2. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Jim Lanford 2003)
  3. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Paul Willis 2003)
  4. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (WJ Starck 2003)
  5. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Clement Ross 2003)
  6. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  7. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  8. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (John Peacock 2003)
  9. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  10. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  11. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Paul Uttermohlen 2003)
  12. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  13. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Alex McCombie 2003)
  14. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  15. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  16. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Brian Fries 2003)
  17. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Bob Minor 2003)
  18. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003)
  19. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  20. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (WJ Starck 2003)
  21. Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 05:25 PM, Kimberly D. Walls wrote:> Let me get this straight... > (I'm sorry, but it's really, really, really hard for me to imagine > this to > be true.) > > I buy outlandexpeditions.com > I buy ocoeeriver.net > I build a site for www.outlandexpeditions.com > I want www.ocoeeriver.net to point to that site. > > It costs me $50 plus the time and effort of serial numbers, etc... to > do > nothing more than use a [redirect]?? Some will say to have Apache do the redirect and save the $50 It is it is so easy to have WebCat do it. (dynamic redirects are so easy and useful with WebDNA)But, I would like a better solution to this mess. I have a lot of little web sites that live on my e-commerce server that use just a little WebDNA (simple tracking, includes and a few redirects)Looks like I'm not upgrading till I figure out what is really going to cost, > Then it costs me another $50 + $50 so that the two domains continue to > work > when the visitor doesn't type in www.?? > > I'm sorry if I'm being redundant here, but I'm seriously having a hard > time > thinking that it costs me $150.00 to make this happen, when the 2 > domains > together only cost me $30 and about 3 minutes worth of time to > configure my > server. > > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Jim Lanford

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

using showpage and showcart commands (1996) emailer (1997) Emailer error 571 (1998) [OT] Theiving B*****ds (2004) all records returned. (1997) Word Break (1999) Separate SSL Server (1997) ThreadMem ignored? (1998) Instructions for Digest (1997) HELP! 10K hits per hour for pages that no longer exist! (2000) Moment of Thanks (1997) NT Manual (1997) PIXO (1997) Not really WebCat (1997) AOL and referrers on target=_blank (2000) test (2000) NT considerations (1997) Search design (1997) Problem 2 of 2 (was: Shipping Confusion) (2000) redirect problem - bug? (2003)