Re: [WebDNA] Sorry WebDNA server not running /Template ERROR/ Slow
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2019
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 114766
interpreted = N
texte = 2392 > The ecosystem for software used by most hosting providers > is really modularized and reliable. =C2=A0They use things like > Softaculo for bundling software packages and then there are > intuitive interfaces for installation and management. =C2=A0No > reason that WebDNA isn=E2=80=99t already packaged as such. WSC doesn't think it's worth the effort or they would have done it by now, so clearly they have other priorities. That's why WebDNA is not already packaged as such.=20 I think WSC no longer cares much about getting programmers and webmasters and hosting services to adopt WebDNA. Instead they seem to be targeting one or more vertical markets now, otherwise why would they have poured so much into Biotype? It's not like any of us ever asked for it. I understand that resources are limited, and in my opinion Chris has done a great job of fixing bugs and adding a few new features over the years. But I think the dream of WebDNA on every server is long gone by now. Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions http://www.webdnasolutions.com Urgent/Emergency Phone: (228) 222-2917 Website, Database, Network, and Communication Systems --------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list talk@webdna.us To unsubscribe, E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.us archives: http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55 Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us .
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
2392 > The ecosystem for software used by most hosting providers > is really modularized and reliable. =C2=A0They use things like > Softaculo for bundling software packages and then there are > intuitive interfaces for installation and management. =C2=A0No > reason that WebDNA isn=E2=80=99t already packaged as such. WSC doesn't think it's worth the effort or they would have done it by now, so clearly they have other priorities. That's why WebDNA is not already packaged as such.=20 I think WSC no longer cares much about getting programmers and webmasters and hosting services to adopt WebDNA. Instead they seem to be targeting one or more vertical markets now, otherwise why would they have poured so much into Biotype? It's not like any of us ever asked for it. I understand that resources are limited, and in my opinion Chris has done a great job of fixing bugs and adding a few new features over the years. But I think the dream of WebDNA on every server is long gone by now. Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions http://www.webdnasolutions.com Urgent/Emergency Phone: (228) 222-2917 Website, Database, Network, and Communication Systems --------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list talk@webdna.us To unsubscribe, E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.us archives: http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55 Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us .
WebDNA Solutions
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Separate SSL Server (1997)
Emailer setup (1997)
800x600 (2003)
What abobut variables named max ??? (2000)
WebCat2 beta 11 - new prefs ... (1997)
notification solutions (1997)
Multiple fields on 1 input (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - More limits on [include] (1997)
Remove Command not working (2000)
pop up menu's (1998)
japanese characters (1997)
Progress !! WAS: Trouble with formula.db (1997)
WebCat Error Log problem (2.0.1, acgi, Mac) (1997)
Problems appending to database (1997)
webcat2b12 CGI -- Date comparisons (1997)
Secure server question (1997)
Database Fields (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugin - [math][date][/math] problem (1997)
Nested vs conditional (1997)
2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)