Re: 5.0 Pricing
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 48094
interpreted = N
texte = Couple this with Domain Masking from godaddy.com and you have a bargain ;)Domain Forwarding with MaskingDomain masking lets you protect the addressof a particular site, while still allowing customers to access the content.Here's how it works: First, you purchase a domain name, say,public-site.com. This is only an address, though; public-site.com is notgoing to have its own web site. You use this address to display the contentof another web site, say, private-site.com. So your visitors type inwww.public-site.com and see the display from the private-site.com web site.But they do *not* see the private-site.com address. To do this, just selectDomain Forwarding with Masking. We'll take care of the rest. > > No, the sandbox feature has nothing to do with the licensing. This has been> discussed several times. You can have multiple sandboxes for each domain:> > www.mydomain.com/sandbox1> www.mydomain.com/sandbox2> www.mydomain.com/sandbox3> > all running under a single site license. These are all completely> independently managed areas with seperate admin files, etc. If they did this> right, it also means that sandbox2 can die screaming due to bad code and it> won't take the whole server with it!-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
|
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Clint Davis 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Jim Lanford 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Paul Willis 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (WJ Starck 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Clement Ross 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (John Peacock 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Paul Uttermohlen 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Alex McCombie 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Brian Fries 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Bob Minor 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
- Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (WJ Starck 2003)
- Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (John Peacock 2003)
- Re: New Title was: 5.0 pricing (laurent pladys 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Kenneth Grome 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Kenneth Grome 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Bob Minor 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Donovan 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Donovan 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Stuart Tremain 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alain Russell 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (John Peacock 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alain Russell 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Donovan 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alain Russell 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Kenneth Grome 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (John Peacock 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alex McCombie 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Tim Robinson 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Kenneth Grome 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Dale's Stuff 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Christer Olsson 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Brian Fries 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Michael Davis 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Doug Deck 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Donovan Brooke 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Stuart Tremain 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Christer Olsson 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Palle Bo Nielsen 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Donovan 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Doug Deck 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alain Russell 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Andrew Simpson 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Doug Deck 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (WJ Starck 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alain Russell 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Dale's Stuff 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Doug Deck 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Doug Deck 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Palle Bo Nielsen 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (andy mowrey 2003)
- Re: 5.0 Pricing (Clement Ross 2003)
- 5.0 Pricing (Charles Kline 2003)
|
Couple this with Domain Masking from godaddy.com and you have a bargain ;)Domain Forwarding with MaskingDomain masking lets you protect the addressof a particular site, while still allowing customers to access the content.Here's how it works: First, you purchase a domain name, say,public-site.com. This is only an address, though; public-site.com is notgoing to have its own web site. You use this address to display the contentof another web site, say, private-site.com. So your visitors type inwww.public-site.com and see the display from the private-site.com web site.But they do *not* see the private-site.com address. To do this, just selectDomain Forwarding with Masking. We'll take care of the rest. > > No, the sandbox feature has nothing to do with the licensing. This has been> discussed several times. You can have multiple sandboxes for each domain:> > www.mydomain.com/sandbox1> www.mydomain.com/sandbox2> www.mydomain.com/sandbox3> > all running under a single site license. These are all completely> independently managed areas with seperate admin files, etc. If they did this> right, it also means that sandbox2 can die screaming due to bad code and it> won't take the whole server with it!-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Alain Russell
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997)
[WebDNA] agree? --> also broken when we compare against something with a "!" in it. (2009)
WebCatalog.acgi quitting with error Type 2 (1998)
webcat2b12 CGI -- Date comparisons (1997)
method of payment (1997)
2.0Beta Command Ref (can't find this instruction) (1997)
WebCatalog Use Question (1997)
WC2b15 - [HTMLx]...[/HTMLx] problems (1997)
shipCost (1998)
Attention SMSI - DOCS Error (2004)
WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997)
Set Cookie Problem (2008)
Hiding HTML and breaking the page (1997)
Multiple Passwords (1997)
Calculating multiple shipping... (1997)
SMSI -- a [notfound] context? (2002)
Problem displaying search result (1997)
[MATH] and Dates (1998)
Examples Link? (2000)
WebCatalog Develper Needs Work (2001)